Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38319352›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2024

Patient satisfaction after elective implant removal of the lower extremity - a retrospective cohort study.

Jan Hambrecht, Claudio Canal, Felix Karl-Ludwig Klingebiel, Paul Köhli, Valentin Neuhaus, Hans-Christoph Pape, Yannik Kalbas, Christian Hierholzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Re‑fracture risk following implant removal in consolidated hip fractures: a multicenter retrospective cohort study of 575 patients.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jan HambrechtUniversity Hospital Zurich: UniversitatsSpital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Claudio CanalUniversity Hospital Zurich: UniversitatsSpital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Felix Karl-Ludwig KlingebielUniversity Hospital Zurich: UniversitatsSpital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Paul KöhliCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Valentin NeuhausUniversity Hospital Zurich: UniversitatsSpital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Hans-Christoph PapeUniversity Hospital Zurich: UniversitatsSpital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Yannik Kalbas *University Hospital Zurich: UniversitatsSpital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. yannik.kalbas@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1550-328X
Christian Hierholzer *University Hospital Zurich: UniversitatsSpital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe topic of elective implant removal (IR) in healed fractures of the lower extremity remains controversial, particularly when unspecific symptoms of discomfort, which cannot be quantified, are the primary indication. This study aims to assess indications and outcomes of elective IR of the lower extremity, focusing on unspecific symptoms of discomfort and patient satisfaction postoperatively. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single level I academic trauma center. We included patients who underwent elective IR for healed fractures of the ankle, foot, patella, and proximal tibia from 2016 to 2021. All patients were followed-up for a minimum of 6 weeks after IR. Our outcomes of interest were patient satisfaction, complications, and alleviation of complaints.

resultsA total of 167 patients were included in the study. Unspecific symptoms of discomfort were the most common reason for IR in all investigated anatomical regions of the lower extremity (47.9%), followed by pain (43.1%) and limited range of motion (4.2%). 4.8% of patients experienced a combination of pain and range of motion limitation. Among all patients, 47.9% reported subjective improvement after IR. IRs based on unspecific symptoms of discomfort were significantly less likely to show alleviation of complaints after IR (27.5%, OR 0.19, p ≤ 0.01). Patients who reported limited range of motion (OR 1.7, p = 0.41) or pain (OR 6.0, p = 0) were significantly more likely to be satisfied after IR. Patients who reported sensitivity to cold weather also showed a decrease of complaints after IR (OR 3.6, p = 0.03). Major complications occurred in 2.1% of cases. The minor complication rate was 8.4% (predominantly impaired wound healing). Smoking patients showed a significantly higher risk of complications after IR (OR 5.2, p = 0.006). Persistent pain postoperatively was detected in 14.7%.

conclusionWhen elective IR for consolidated fractures of the lower extremity is primarily motivated by patients' subjective symptoms of discomfort, the risk for postoperative dissatisfaction significantly increases. Objective symptoms on the other hand are associated with higher satisfaction after IR. While the procedure is generally safe, minor complications such as wound healing disorders can occur, especially in smokers. Patient education and well-documented informed consent are critical.

Indexed as

Device RemovalElective Surgical ProceduresPatient SatisfactionAdultAgedFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, BoneHumansLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesHealed fracturesImplant removalLower extremityPROMs/Patient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID38319352
PMCPMC11249532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.