ArticleOperative Orthopadie und Traumatologie2024
[Imaging in pediatric traumatology and orthopedics].
Article in Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cervical spine clearance in pediatric trauma patients - Consensus algorithm of the Pediatric Spinal Trauma Group of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery (DGOU).European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- [Imaging in hip disorders in childhood and adolescence].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Predictors for the necessity of open reduction in the treatment of pediatric both bone forearm fractures with elastic stable intramedullary nailing.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Rare pediatric Galeazzi lesion with progressive wrist deformity.Case reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery · 2026Article
- Subtalar Arthroereisis with Calcaneus Stop Screws-Can the Angles on Pre- and Post-Surgical X-Ray Images Be Reliably Measured by Artificial Intelligence?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional or digital radiography is still the basis of imaging diagnostics of the skeletal system in pediatric patients. It is considered the gold standard for diagnosis, treatment selection, and follow-up. In addition, procedures such as ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and also nuclear medicine techniques can and should be used. It is advantageous to use trained radiology technicians who are familiar with the handling of children in X‑ray diagnostics. If there is no dedicated pediatric radiology department, it is recommended to follow the guidelines from radiology societies (as low as reasonably achievable [ALARA]) and radiation protection commissions. The present article describes how state-of-the-art tools such as dose monitoring systems and software-controlled image processing and also postprocessing can be used. The article provides information on how the various modalities can be optimally used in order to achieve the best result, i.e., diagnosis, with the least possible effort and burden for the child.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.