Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38318986›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2024

Interictal EEG source connectivity to localize the epileptogenic zone in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: A machine learning approach.

Georgios Ntolkeras, Navaneethakrishna Makaram, Matteo Bernabei, Aime Cristina De La Vega, Jeffrey Bolton, Joseph R Madsen, Scellig S D Stone, Phillip L Pearl, Christos Papadelis, Ellen P Grant and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Mapping epileptogenic brain using a unified spatial-temporal-spectral source imaging framework.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Can brain network analyses guide epilepsy surgery?Current opinion in neurology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Georgios NtolkerasFetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging and Developmental Science Center, Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2281-035X
Navaneethakrishna MakaramFetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging and Developmental Science Center, Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Matteo BernabeiFetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging and Developmental Science Center, Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Aime Cristina De La VegaFetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging and Developmental Science Center, Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jeffrey BoltonDivision of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Joseph R MadsenDivision of Epilepsy Surgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Scellig S D StoneDivision of Epilepsy Surgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Phillip L PearlDivision of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6373-1068
Christos PapadelisJane and John Justin Institute for Mind Health, Cook Children's Health Care System, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6125-9217
Ellen P GrantFetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging and Developmental Science Center, Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Eleonora TamiliaFetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging and Developmental Science Center, Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1235-3052
Boston Children's Hospital · USCook Children's Health Care System · US

Funding

Combining Brain Connectivity and Excitability to Plan Epilepsy Surgery in Children: A New Approach to Augment Presurgical Intracranial ElectroencephalographyR03NS127044 · NINDS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI TAMILIA, ELEONORA · 2023 to 2024
$177k
NIH HHS R03NS127044NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS127044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo deconstruct the epileptogenic networks of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) using source functional connectivity (FC) analysis; unveil the FC biomarkers of the epileptogenic zone (EZ); and develop machine learning (ML) models to estimate the EZ using brief interictal electroencephalography (EEG) data.

methodsWe analyzed scalp EEG from 50 patients with DRE who had surgery. We reconstructed the activity (electrical source imaging [ESI]) of virtual sensors (VSs) across the whole cortex and computed FC separately for epileptiform and non-epileptiform EEG epochs (with or without spikes). In patients with good outcome (Engel 1a), four cortical regions were defined: EZ (resection) and three non-epileptogenic zones (NEZs) in the same and opposite hemispheres. Region-specific FC features in six frequency bands and three spatial ranges (long, short, inner) were compared between regions (Wilcoxon sign-rank). We developed ML classifiers to identify the VSs in the EZ using VS-specific FC features. Cross-validation was performed using good outcome data. Performance was compared with poor outcomes and interictal spike localization.

resultsFC differed between EZ and NEZs (p < .05) during non-epileptiform and epileptiform epochs, showing higher FC in the EZ than its homotopic contralateral NEZ. During epileptiform epochs, the NEZ in the epileptogenic hemisphere showed higher FC than its contralateral NEZ. In good outcome patients, the ML classifiers reached 75% accuracy to the resection (91% sensitivity; 74% specificity; distance from EZ: 38 mm) using epileptiform epochs (gamma and beta frequency bands) and 62% accuracy using broadband non-epileptiform epochs, both outperforming spike localization (accuracy = 47%; p < .05; distance from EZ: 57 mm). Lower performance was seen in poor outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE: We present an FC approach to extract EZ biomarkers from brief EEG data. Increased FC in various frequencies characterized the EZ during epileptiform and non-epileptiform epochs. FC-based ML models identified the resection better in good than poor outcome patients, demonstrating their potential for presurgical use in pediatric DRE.

Indexed as

Drug Resistant EpilepsyElectroencephalographyBiomarkersChildHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBiomarkersEEGelectrical source imagingepilepsy surgeryfunctional connectivitymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38318986
PMCPMC11018464
OpenAlexW4391611617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.