Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38318839›Full record

ArticleWaste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA2024

Analysis of different polypropylene waste bales: Evaluation of the source material for PP recycling.

Jutta Geier, Márton Bredács, Andreas Witschnigg, Daniel Vollprecht, Gernot Oreski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jutta GeierPolymer Competence Center Leoben GmbH, Leoben, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2895-9905
Márton BredácsPolymer Competence Center Leoben GmbH, Leoben, Austria.
Andreas WitschniggPreZero Polymers Austria GmbH, Haimburg, Austria.
Daniel VollprechtChair of Resource and Chemical Engineering, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1809-5223
Gernot OreskiPolymer Competence Center Leoben GmbH, Leoben, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of the polypropylene (PP) recyclates in certain processing methods and applications is still limited by their quality. The high melt flow rate (MFR) and the inconsistent properties of recyclates are common obstacles to their use. Therefore, this work aims to identify possible reasons for the low and inconsistent quality of PP recyclates depending on the source material in PP waste bales. The levels of polymeric and non-polymeric contaminants were assessed. As mixing of different PP grades is an issue for the MFR, the proportions of the different processing grades were also investigated and the potential of sorting by processing method to produce lower MFR recyclates was assessed. The analysis showed that the waste bales, although pre-sorted, still contained high amounts of contaminants. Injection moulding was found to be the predominant processing method in the bales, explaining the high MFR of PP recyclates. However, a sufficiently high amount of low MFR products was found in the bales, which seems promising for the production of low MFR recyclates. Seasonal variations in the composition of the waste bales were identified as one of the reasons for the inconsistent qualities of recyclates. These results highlight the importance of proper sorting and treatment of PP waste bales prior to reprocessing in order to obtain high-quality recycled products.

Indexed as

PolypropylenesRecyclingRefuse DisposalWaste ManagementPolypropylenescontaminantsmelt flow ratepolypropylene recyclingrecyclate qualitysortingwaste bales

Identifiers

PMID38318839
PMCPMC11373154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.