Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38318727›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2024

Norwegian population-based study of effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies.

Konstantin H Kostov, Hrisimir Kostov, Pål Gunnar Larsson, Oliver Henning, Kari Modalsli Aaberg, Arild Egge, Jukka Peltola, Morten Ingvar Lossius

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vagus nerve stimulation inEpilepsy & behavior reports · 2025
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Konstantin H KostovNeurological Department, National Center for Epilepsy, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7750-4480
Hrisimir KostovNeurophysiological Department, National Center for Epilepsy, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6033-9039
Pål Gunnar LarssonNeurosurgical Department, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2248-8970
Oliver HenningNeurophysiological Department, National Center for Epilepsy, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5562-0854
Kari Modalsli AabergPediatric Department, National Center for Epilepsy, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Arild EggeNeurosurgical Department, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jukka PeltolaDepartment of Neurology, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4119-8063
Morten Ingvar LossiusNeurological Department, National Center for Epilepsy, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5982-7737
Oslo University Hospital · NOTampere University Hospital · FI

Funding

Norwegian Epilepsy Association (Norsk Epilepsiforbund)Norwegian Epilepsy Society (Norsk Epilepsiselskap)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEvaluate the long-term efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEE) compared with epilepsy patients without intellectual disability (ID).

methodsLong-term outcomes from a Norwegian VNS quality registry are reported in 105 patients with DEEs (Lennox-Gastaut syndrome [LGS] n = 62; Dravet n = 16; Rett n = 9; other syndromes n = 18) were compared with 212 epilepsy patients without ID, with median follow-up of 88 and 72 months, respectively. Total seizure reduction was evaluated at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months. Effect on different seizure types was evaluated at baseline and last observation carried forward (LOCF).

resultsMedian monthly seizure frequency at LOCF was reduced by 42.2% (p < 0.001) in patients with DEE and by 55.8% (p < 0.001) in patients without ID. In DEE patients, ≥50% seizure reduction at 6 and 24 months were 17.1% and 37.1%, respectively, and 33.5% and 48.6% for patients without ID. Seizure reduction ≥75% at 60 months occurred in 14.3% of DEE patients and 23.1% of patients without ID. Highest median reduction was for atonic seizures, most notably 64.6% for LGS patients. A better effect was seen at 2 years among DEE patients with unchanged medication compared with those with changed medication (54.5% vs. 35.6% responders, p = 0.078). More DEE patients were reported to have greater improvement in ictal or postictal severity (43.8% vs. 28.3%, p = 0.006) and alertness (62.9% vs. 31.6%, p < 0.001) than patients without ID. For both groups, use of the magnet reduced seizure severity. Hoarseness was the most common adverse effect in both groups. In addition, DEE patients were frequently reported to have sleep disturbance, general discomfort, or abdominal problems. SIGNIFICANCE: Our data indicate that VNS is very effective for atonic seizures. Patients without ID had best overall seizure reduction, however, patients with DEE had higher retention rates probably due to other positive effects. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: DEE refers to a group of patients with severe epilepsy and intellectual disability. Many of these patients have restricted lifestyles with frequent seizures. VNS is a treatment option for patients who do not respond well to medicines, either because of insufficient effect or serious adverse effects. Our study shows that VNS is well tolerated in this patient group and leads to a reduction in all seizure types, most notably for seizures leading to fall. Many patients experience other positive effects like shorter and milder seizures, as well as improvement in alertness.

Indexed as

EpilepsyIntellectual DisabilityLennox Gastaut SyndromeVagus Nerve StimulationHumansSeizuresTreatment Outcomeatonic seizuresDravet syndromeLennox–Gastaut syndromelong‐term effectsvagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38318727
PMCPMC10984305
OpenAlexW4391608287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.