Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38318705›Full record

ArticleUltrasonic imaging2024

Spectral-based Quantitative Ultrasound Imaging Processing Techniques: Comparisons of RF Versus IQ Approaches.

Mingrui Liu, Zhengchang Kou, Yuning Zhao, James W Wiskin, Gregory J Czarnota, Michael L Oelze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonic imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Toward Real-Time Backscatter Coefficient Estimation Incorporating the U-Net Segmentation and an In Vivo Reference Target.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Deep-Learning-Driven High Spatial Resolution Attenuation Imaging for Ultrasound Tomography (AI-UT).IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mingrui LiuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-7642-9506
Zhengchang KouBeckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5322-0267
Yuning ZhaoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
James W WiskinQT Imaging Inc., Novato, CA, USA.
Gregory J CzarnotaDepartment of Medical Biophysics and Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Michael L OelzeDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3099-7425

Funding

Developing a quantitative ultrasound breast scanner for identifying early response of breast cancer to chemotherapyR01CA273700 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI Gregory Jan Czarnota, Michael L. Oelze · 2022 to 2026
$2.5M
Use of Radiological Clips for Improving Quantitative Ultrasound ImagingR01CA251939 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI OELZE, MICHAEL L. · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA251939NCI NIH HHS R01 CA273700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is an imaging technique which includes spectral-based parameterization. Typical spectral-based parameters include the backscatter coefficient (BSC) and attenuation coefficient slope (ACS). Traditionally, spectral-based QUS relies on the radio frequency (RF) signal to calculate the spectral-based parameters. Many clinical and research scanners only provide the in-phase and quadrature (IQ) signal. To acquire the RF data, the common approach is to convert IQ signal back into RF signal via mixing with a carrier frequency. In this study, we hypothesize that the performance, that is, accuracy and precision, of spectral-based parameters calculated directly from IQ data is as good as or better than using converted RF data. To test this hypothesis, estimation of the BSC and ACS using RF and IQ data from software, physical phantoms and in vivo rabbit data were analyzed and compared. The results indicated that there were only small differences in estimates of the BSC between when using the original RF, the IQ derived from the original RF and the RF reconverted from the IQ, that is, root mean square errors (RMSEs) were less than 0.04. Furthermore, the structural similarity index measure (SSIM) was calculated for ACS maps with a value greater than 0.96 for maps created using the original RF, IQ data and reconverted RF. On the other hand, the processing time using the IQ data compared to RF data were substantially less, that is, reduced by more than a factor of two. Therefore, this study confirms two things: (1) there is no need to convert IQ data back to RF data for conducting spectral-based QUS analysis, because the conversion from IQ back into RF data can introduce artifacts. (2) For the implementation of real-time QUS, there is an advantage to convert the original RF data into IQ data to conduct spectral-based QUS analysis because IQ data-based QUS can improve processing speed.

Indexed as

UltrasonographyAnimalsPhantoms, ImagingRabbitsattenuation imagingbackscatter coefficientIQ signalquantitative ultrasoundRF signal

Identifiers

PMID38318705
PMCPMC10962227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.