Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38318665›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2024

Comparing the Extraction Performance in Mouse Plasma of Different Biphasic Methods for Polar and Nonpolar Compounds.

Friederike Gutmann, Raphaela Fritsche-Guenther, Daniela B Dias, Jennifer A Kirwan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Friederike GutmannMetabolomics Platform, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6763-2270
Raphaela Fritsche-GuentherMetabolomics Platform, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Daniela B DiasMetabolomics Platform, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Jennifer A KirwanMetabolomics Platform, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5423-1651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many metabolomic studies are interested in both polar and nonpolar analyses. However, the available sample volume often precludes multiple separate extractions. Therefore, there are major advantages in performing a biphasic extraction and retaining both phases for subsequent separate analyses. To be successful, such approaches require the method to be robust and repeatable for both phases. Hence, we determined the performance of three extraction protocols, plus two variant versions, using 25 μL of commercially available mouse plasma. The preferred option for nonpolar lipids was a modified diluted version of a method employing methyl

Indexed as

Methyl EthersAnimalsChemical FractionationLipidsMetabolomicsMicePlasmaReproducibility of ResultsLipidsMethyl Ethersmethyl tert-butyl etherbiphasic extractioncentral carbon metabolismlipidomicstargeted methodsvalidation

Identifiers

PMID38318665
PMCPMC11301682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.