ArticleCureus2024
Evaluation of Infraorbital Foramen Position Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in a Cohort of Central Gujarat, Indian Population.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Morphometric analysis and spatial localization of the infraorbital foramen in adult dry human skulls: bilateral symmetry, sexual dimorphism, and accessory foramina.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Facial Foramen Diagnostic and Surgical Role as Reference Points in Asymmetries-Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Preliminary Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe location of infraorbital foramen varies between geographic locations. Thus, population-specific information is required to facilitate the prediction of its exact location.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) sections to evaluate the distance between the infraorbital foramen and incisal edge of the maxillary central incisor, the occlusal plane of the maxillary second premolar, and the alveolar crest over the maxillary second premolar using CBCT in Central Gujarat, Indian population. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed to calculate means and standard deviations for each measured parameter. The statistical significance level was defined at p<0.05.
resultsThe distance between the infraorbital foramen and incisal surface of the maxillary central incisor was (mean ± standard deviation) R=49.39 ± 3.12 mm and L=49.49 ± 3.29 mm, the occlusal plane of the maxillary second premolar was R=39.02 ± 2.65 mm and L=39.49 ± 2.53 mm, and the alveolar crest over the maxillary second premolar was R=32.64 ± 2.67 mm and L=31.64 ± 2.33 mm. There was no significant difference in the mean values of all variables between genders and age groups (p>0.05). The distance between the infraorbital foramen and the alveolar crest over the maxillary second premolar was greater on the right side (p<0.05).
conclusionThe results of this study were analogous to those observed in a cohort of the Turkish population but varied from those observed in a cohort of the Sri Lankan population. Hence, more population-specific studies are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.