ReviewCureus2024
Circulating Tumor Cells in Oral Cancer.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular and Genetic Pathogenesis of Oral Cancer: A Basis for Customized Diagnosis and Treatment.Biology · 2025Review
- Distant metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: immune escape mechanism and new perspectives on treatment.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- PADI4 expression in baseline circulating tumour cells acts as a prognostic biomarker in oral squamous cell carcinoma.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Till now, oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is graded as well-differentiated, moderately-differentiated, poorly-differentiated, and undifferentiated. However, this grading does not have a prediction of the prognosis of the patient. Also, prognosis impacts lymph node metastases, surgical margins, and vascular invasions (neural invasion, muscular invasion, salivary gland invasion). The prognosis of lymph node metastases is significant, which affects the survival of the patients which is 50%. So, a dependable blood marker is needed for prognosis in OSCC patients with loco-regional and distant recurrence. Some factors can be assisted only after surgery and invasive techniques to check the prognosis of the disease. Despite the ease of examining the oral cavity, there is no practical approach for non-invasive screening and detecting cancer. As it is abrupt to use such invasive procedures from time to time, there is a need for nonsurgical and reliable techniques to assess the progression of tumors. Also, frozen sections are helpful during the intraoperative procedure to evaluate the lymph node metastases. An increase in the number of tumor cells through blood is a significant event in disease metastases toward the peripheral blood. Oral health impact assessment instruments could aid in determining the quality of life, and their usage in the initial stages of oral carcinoma could help physicians choose the best treatment option for enhancing the quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.