Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38318575›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Circulating Tumor Cells in Oral Cancer.

Yashika K Sharma, Madhuri Gawande, Amit Reche, Muskan R Bardia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yashika K SharmaOral Pathology and Microbiology, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Madhuri GawandeOral Pathology and Microbiology, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Amit RechePublic Health Dentistry, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Muskan R BardiaOral Pathology and Microbiology, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Till now, oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is graded as well-differentiated, moderately-differentiated, poorly-differentiated, and undifferentiated. However, this grading does not have a prediction of the prognosis of the patient. Also, prognosis impacts lymph node metastases, surgical margins, and vascular invasions (neural invasion, muscular invasion, salivary gland invasion). The prognosis of lymph node metastases is significant, which affects the survival of the patients which is 50%. So, a dependable blood marker is needed for prognosis in OSCC patients with loco-regional and distant recurrence. Some factors can be assisted only after surgery and invasive techniques to check the prognosis of the disease. Despite the ease of examining the oral cavity, there is no practical approach for non-invasive screening and detecting cancer. As it is abrupt to use such invasive procedures from time to time, there is a need for nonsurgical and reliable techniques to assess the progression of tumors. Also, frozen sections are helpful during the intraoperative procedure to evaluate the lymph node metastases. An increase in the number of tumor cells through blood is a significant event in disease metastases toward the peripheral blood. Oral health impact assessment instruments could aid in determining the quality of life, and their usage in the initial stages of oral carcinoma could help physicians choose the best treatment option for enhancing the quality of life.

Indexed as

biomarkersdiagnostic toolliquid biopsymetastasistreatment implications

Identifiers

PMID38318575
PMCPMC10839405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.