Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38318544›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

The Relationship Between Occupational Functionality and Metacognition in Patients with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

Esra Yalım, Cansu Ünsal, İbrahim Gündoğmuş

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Esra YalımPsychiatry, Çankırı State Hospital, Çankırı, TUR.
Cansu ÜnsalPsychiatry, Silifke State Hospital, Mersin, TUR.
İbrahim GündoğmuşPsychiatry, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, TUR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveObsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is one of the most common mental disorders with a loss of functionality in many areas of life. The current study aims to reveal the relationship between occupational functionality and metacognition in OCD patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe cross-sectional study sample consisted of 183 participants diagnosed with OCD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria. Participants were evaluated with the Yale-Brown Obsession and Compulsion Scale (Y-BOCS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Metacognition Scale (MCQ-30). The occupational functioning of the participants was determined by the basic version of the semi-structured Longitudinal Follow-up Evaluation form (LIFE-BASE) in interviews with the clinician. The LIFE-BASE form divided the study sample into functional (n=92) and non-functional (n=91).

resultsIt was determined that the mean age of the study sample was 32.49±8.65 years, and 54.1% (n=99) of them were female. When the two groups were compared, statistically significant differences were found in gender (p<0.001), education (p=0.012), Y-BOCS compulsion (p=0.003), and total scores (p=0.006). In the comparison of the groups, a statistical difference was found between the MCQ-30 Positive Beliefs subscale (p<0.05). However, no statistical difference was found between uncontrollability and danger, cognitive confidence, belief in controlling thoughts, and cognitive awareness. In addition, it was found that gender and the MCQ-30 positive beliefs score could predict occupational functioning.

conclusionThe present study is important because it was the first study to show the effects of positive beliefs on occupational functioning in OCD patients. However, further studies are needed on the underlying causes of this effect.

Indexed as

metacognitionnegative beliefsobsessive-compulsive disorderoccupational functionalitypositive beliefs

Identifiers

PMID38318544
PMCPMC10840066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.