ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2023
Complementing Hi-C information for 3D chromatin reconstruction by ChromStruct.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simultaneous modeling of chromatin conformation changes from multiple single-cell interaction maps with ChromMovie.Genome research · 2026Article
- The challenge of chromatin model comparison and validation: A project from the first international 4D Nucleome Hackathon.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- ChromMovie: A Molecular Dynamics Approach for Simultaneous Modeling of Chromatin Conformation Changes from Multiple Single-Cell Hi-C Maps.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A multiscale method proposed elsewhere for reconstructing plausible 3D configurations of the chromatin in cell nuclei is recalled, based on the integration of contact data from Hi-C experiments and additional information coming from ChIP-seq, RNA-seq and ChIA-PET experiments. Provided that the additional data come from independent experiments, this kind of approach is supposed to leverage them to complement possibly noisy, biased or missing Hi-C records. When the different data sources are mutually concurrent, the resulting solutions are corroborated; otherwise, their validity would be weakened. Here, a problem of reliability arises, entailing an appropriate choice of the relative weights to be assigned to the different informational contributions. A series of experiments is presented that help to quantify the advantages and the limitations offered by this strategy. Whereas the advantages in accuracy are not always significant, the case of missing Hi-C data demonstrates the effectiveness of additional information in reconstructing the highly packed segments of the structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.