ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2024
Development of Emerging Infectious Diseases Preventive Health Behavior (EID-PHB) Scale and Validation of the Complex Models.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emerging Infectious Diseases Preventive Health Behavior (EID-PHB) scale: Turkish validity and reliability study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Emerging Infectious Diseases are one of the world's leading causes of death, and preventive measures must be implemented to minimize human casualties. Research on preventive behavior relies on the preventive behavior scale and it has an impact on the findings. Purpose: This study aimed to develop an Emerging Infectious Diseases Preventive Health Behavior (EID-PHB) Scale and verify the validity and reliability of the complex models. Methods: Initial items were generated through a literature review and interviews, based on the proposed conceptual framework of transmission-based precautions. 14 experts reviewed the preliminary items for content validity and 20 adults for face validity. Data were collected online by a research company from April 28 to May 3, 2023. A total of 533 participants completed the survey, and subjects were assigned through simple random sampling. The first sample (n = 330) was used for item analysis and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), and the second sample (n = 203) was used for Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), convergent validity, discriminant validity, criterion validity, and reliability. The test-retest reliability was assessed in 34 adults. Results: The final instrument derived six components (droplet, contact, airborne, bloodborne, environmental prevention, and psychological coping), nine indicators, and 34 items. The CFA indicated that all the complex models had a good fit and the integrated factors were confirmed through validity tests. The Cronbach's alpha for the 34 items was 0.92, and the criterion validity was verified (r = 0.85, Conclusion: The EID-PHB is a valid and reliable tool that can be used to determine preventive behaviors against emerging infectious diseases. This tool is expected to provide a conceptual framework for future research, contribute to the clinical practice and education, and establish strategies and policies for improving individual and public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.