Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38318468›Full record

ArticleJournal of data science, statistics, and visualisation2022

Network Comparison with Interpretable Contrastive Network Representation Learning.

Takanori Fujiwara, Jian Zhao, Francine Chen, Yaoliang Yu, Kwan-Liu Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of data science, statistics, and visualisation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Takanori FujiwaraUniversity of California, Davis.
Jian ZhaoUniversity of Waterloo.
Francine ChenToyota Research Institute.
Yaoliang YuUniversity of Waterloo.
Kwan-Liu MaUniversity of California, Davis.

Funding

SCH: Smart EHR Data Analytics to Enhance Cancer Care Multiteam SystemsR01CA270454 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI MA, KWAN-LIU, TU, SHIN-PING · 2022 to 2024
$791k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA270454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying unique characteristics in a network through comparison with another network is an essential network analysis task. For example, with networks of protein interactions obtained from normal and cancer tissues, we can discover unique types of interactions in cancer tissues. This analysis task could be greatly assisted by contrastive learning, which is an emerging analysis approach to discover salient patterns in one dataset relative to another. However, existing contrastive learning methods cannot be directly applied to networks as they are designed only for high-dimensional data analysis. To address this problem, we introduce a new analysis approach called

Indexed as

contrastive learningexplainable AIMachine learningnetwork analysisvisualization

Identifiers

PMID38318468
PMCPMC10840760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.