Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38318309›Full record

ReviewThe archives of bone and joint surgery2024

Diagnostic Value of Radiographic Singh Index Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scan in Diagnosing Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review.

Elham Ghalenavi, Zahra Mirfeizi, Kamila Hashemzadeh, Maryam Sahebari, Mohammad Hassan Joker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Deep learning for osteoporosis screening using an anteroposterior hip radiograph image.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  7. Bone Loss in Diabetes Mellitus: Diaporosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elham GhalenaviMashhad Medical School, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran.
Zahra MirfeiziRheumatic Disease Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Science Mashhad, Iran.
Kamila HashemzadehRheumatic Disease Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Science Mashhad, Iran.
Maryam SahebariRheumatic Disease Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Science Mashhad, Iran.
Mohammad Hassan JokerRheumatic Disease Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Science Mashhad, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Since various medications can control the rate of fractures and subsequent complications of osteoporosis, the early detection of the disease is crucial. This systematic study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Singh index (SI) with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as a benchmark standard for diagnosing osteoporosis. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) were utilized in the current study. A detailed search was carried out using PubMed and Scopus from inception to 30 May 2022. Examining quality of the studies was performed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). Results: A total of 22 studies were included. In general, 50% of the studies considered SI a poor screening tool for detecting osteoporosis due to a negligible inter-observer agreement between SI and DEXA or a poor correlation of SI with the bone mineral density (BMD) category or DEXA T-score. A moderate inter-observer agreement was reported for SI in 5 (55.6%) studies. Among the studies assessing the sensitivity and specificity of SI compared to DEXA (n=13), six studies estimated a low sensitivity for SI. Conclusion: While there is supporting evidence indicating the potential usefulness of SI for predicting femoral neck fractures in individuals with suspected osteoporosis, numerous studies challenge its reliability and diagnostic value as a screening tool for identifying femoral neck osteoporosis. Further primary studies are required to verify the effectiveness of the SI index in identifying populations at risk of osteoporosis.

Indexed as

Bone mineral densityDEXADual-energy x-rayOsteoporosisSingh index

Identifiers

PMID38318309
PMCPMC10838578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.