Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38318280›Full record

ReviewCurrent research in pharmacology and drug discovery2024

Development of Recombinant Antibody by Yeast Surface Display Technology.

Mujahed I Mustafa, Awad A Alzebair, Ahmed Mohammed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. ADAPT-M: A workflow for rapid, quantitativebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Optimized single-cell gates for yeast display screening.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mujahed I MustafaDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Applied and Industrial Sciences, University of Bahri, Khartoum, Sudan.
Awad A AlzebairDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Omdurman Islamic University, Omdurman, Sudan.
Ahmed MohammedDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Omdurman Islamic University, Omdurman, Sudan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recombinant antibodies have emerged as powerful tools in various fields, including therapeutics, diagnostics, and research applications. The selection of high-affinity antibodies with desired specificity is a crucial step in the development of recombinant antibody-based products. In recent years, yeast surface display technology has gained significant attention as a robust and versatile platform for antibody selection. This graphical review provides an overview of the yeast surface display technology and its applications in recombinant antibody selection. We discuss the key components involved in the construction of yeast surface display libraries, including the antibody gene libraries, yeast host strains, and display vectors. Furthermore, we highlight the strategies employed for affinity maturation and optimization of recombinant antibodies using yeast surface display. Finally, we discuss the advantages and limitations of this technology compared to other antibody selection methods. Overall, yeast surface display technology offers a powerful and efficient approach for the selection of recombinant antibodies, enabling the rapid generation of high-affinity antibodies for various applications.

Indexed as

Affinity maturationRecombinant antibodiesYeast cellsYeast surface display

Identifiers

PMID38318280
PMCPMC10839864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.