Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38318236›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of efgartigimod (ADAPT+): interim results from a phase 3 open-label extension study in participants with generalized myasthenia gravis.

James F Howard, Vera Bril, Tuan Vu, Chafic Karam, Stojan Peric, Jan L De Bleecker, Hiroyuki Murai, Andreas Meisel, Said R Beydoun, Mamatha Pasnoor and 8 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03770403 phase3completednot on this map

A Long-Term, Single-Arm, Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 3 Follow-on Trial of ARGX-113-1704 to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of ARGX-113 in Patients With Myasthenia Gravis Having Generalized Muscle Weakness

TypeinterventionalSponsorargenxRan2019 to 2022Enrolled151ConditionsGeneralized Myasthenia GravisArmsARGX-113
NCT06765161 phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Efgartigimod in IVIG Dependent Myasthenia Gravis Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorClinique Neuro-OutaouaisRan2025 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsMyasthaenia GravisArmsefgartigimod administration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Italian recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of myasthenia gravis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

James F HowardDepartment of Neurology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Vera BrilEllen and Martin Prosserman Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Tuan VuDepartment of Neurology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, United States.
Chafic KaramPenn Neuroscience Center-Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Stojan PericNeurology Clinic, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Jan L De BleeckerDepartment of Neurology and Neuromuscular Reference Center, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Hiroyuki MuraiDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan.
Andreas MeiselDepartment of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Said R BeydounDepartment of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Mamatha PasnoorDepartment of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Antonio Gugliettaargenx, Ghent, Belgium.
Benjamin Van Hoorickargenx, Ghent, Belgium.
Sophie Steelandargenx, Ghent, Belgium.
Caroline T'joenargenx, Ghent, Belgium.
Kimiaki UtsugisawaDepartment of Neurology, Hanamaki General Hospital, Hanamaki, Japan.
Jan VerschuurenDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Renato MantegazzaDepartment of Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Diseases, Fondazione Istituto Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
ADAPT+ Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: ADAPT+ assessed the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of efgartigimod in adult participants with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). Methods: ADAPT+ was an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, up to 3-year extension of the pivotal phase 3 ADAPT study. Efgartigimod was administered in treatment cycles of 4 intravenous infusions (one 10 mg/kg infusion per week). Initiation of subsequent treatment cycles was individualized based on clinical evaluation. Safety endpoints included incidence and severity of adverse events. Efficacy endpoints assessed disease severity using Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores. Results: As of January 2022, 151 participants had rolled over to ADAPT+ and 145 had received ≥1 dose of efgartigimod, of whom, 111 (76.6%) were AChR-Ab+ and 34 (23.4%) were AChR-Ab-. Mean study duration (treatment plus follow-up) was 548 days, and participants received up to 17 treatment cycles, corresponding to 217.6 participant-years of exposure. In the overall population, 123 (84.8%) participants reported ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event; most frequent were headache (36 [24.8%]), COVID-19 (22 [15.2%]), and nasopharyngitis (20 [13.8%]). Clinically meaningful improvement (CMI) in mean MG-ADL and QMG scores was seen as early as 1 week following the first infusion across multiple cycles in AChR-Ab+ and AChR-Ab- participants. Maximal MG-ADL and QMG improvements aligned with onset and magnitude of total IgG and AChR-Ab reductions. For AChR-Ab+ participants at any time point in each of the first 10 treatment cycles, more than 90% had a maximum reduction of ≥2 points (CMI) in MG-ADL total score; across the 7 cycles in which QMG was measured, 69.4% to 91.3% of participants demonstrated a maximum reduction of ≥3 points (CMI) in QMG total score. Many participants demonstrated improvements well beyond CMI thresholds. In AChR-Ab+ participants with ≥1 year of combined follow-up between ADAPT and ADAPT+, mean number of annualized cycles was 4.7 per year (median [range] 5.0 [0.5-7.6]). Conclusion: Results of ADAPT+ corroborate the substantial clinical improvements seen with efgartigimod in ADAPT and support its long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy, as well as an individualized dosing regimen for treatment of gMG. Clinical trial registration: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03770403, NCT03770403.

Indexed as

antibody fragmentautoantibody reductionefgartigimodFcRnIgG recyclingmyasthenia gravisneonatal Fc receptorneonatal Fc receptor antagonist

Identifiers

PMID38318236
PMCPMC10842202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.