Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38318091›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2024

Early outcomes of single-port robotic left lateral sectionectomy in patients with hepatic tumor.

Young-Hyun Na, Wan-Bae Kim, Jae-Seung Kang, Sae Byeol Choi, Wan-Joon Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Application of the Da Vinci Single-Port (SP) Robot in General Surgery: A First Systematic Review.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Single+1 Port Robotic Splenectomy Using the da Vinci SP System-Experience of a Single Centre.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Young-Hyun NaDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4668-5060
Wan-Bae KimDivision of Hepatobiliary Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6689-3118
Jae-Seung KangDivision of Hepatobiliary Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6587-9579
Sae Byeol ChoiDivision of Hepatobiliary Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7406-5323
Wan-Joon KimDivision of Hepatobiliary Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4800-7573

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (L-LLS) stands as a cornerstone procedure in hepatobiliary minimal surgery, frequently employed for various benign and malignant liver lesions. This study aimed to analyze the peri- and postoperative surgical outcomes of single-port robotic left lateral sectionectomy (SPR-LLS) Methods: From January 2020 through June 2023, 12 patients underwent SPR-LLS. During the same period, 30 L-LLS procedures were performed. In total, 12 patients in the robotic group and 24 patients in the laparoscopic group were matched. Results: When the SPR-LLS and L-LLS groups were compared, the operation time was longer in the SPR-LLS group with less blood loss and shorter hospital stay. Postoperative complications were observed in 3 patients in the L-LLS group (12.5%) and 1 patient in the SPR-LLS group (8.3%). Conclusion: SPR-LLS using the da Vinci SP system was comparable to laparoscopic LLS in terms of surgical outcomes. SPR-LLS was associated with lower blood loss and less postoperative length of stay compared to L-LLS. These findings suggest that left lateral sectionectomy is technically feasible and safe with the da Vinci SP system in select patients.

Indexed as

Hepatocellular carcinomaLaparoscopyLiver diseaseMinimally invasive surgical proceduresRobotic surgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID38318091
PMCPMC10838653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.