Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38318071›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Investigating the acceptance intentions of online shopping assistants in E-commerce interactions: Mediating role of trust and effects of consumer demographics.

Chetanya Singh, Manoj Kumar Dash, Rajendra Sahu, Anil Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chetanya SinghAtal Bihari Vajpayee Indian Institute of Information Technology and Management, Gwalior, India.
Manoj Kumar DashAtal Bihari Vajpayee Indian Institute of Information Technology and Management, Gwalior, India.
Rajendra SahuAtal Bihari Vajpayee Indian Institute of Information Technology and Management, Gwalior, India.
Anil KumarGuildhall School of Business and Law, London Metropolitan University, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Online shopping has various advantages, such as convenience, easy access to information, a greater variety of products or services, discounts, and lower prices. However, the absence of salespeople's personalized assistance decreases the online customer experience. Business-to-consumer e-commerce companies are increasingly implementing online shopping assistants (OSAs), interactive and automated tools used to assist customers without salespeople's assistance. However, no comprehensive model of OSA acceptance in e-commerce exists, including constructs from multiple information system disciplines, sociopsychology, and information security. This study aims to fill these gaps by empirically investigating consumers' intention to accept OSAs from a functional, social, relational, and security perspective. It identifies OSA acceptance factors in e-commerce through an extensive literature review and expert opinion. A research model is proposed after identifying structural relationships among the study's variables from the literature. The study employs partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to validate the proposed model empirically. The results indicate that anthropomorphism, attitude, ease of use, enjoyment, privacy, trust, and usefulness are crucial determinants of acceptance variables. There are significant moderating effects of respondents' gender and education on OSA acceptance. The study's results have substantial implications for academia, extending and validating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) for OSA acceptance in e-commerce. The study will help e-commerce marketers develop optimal adoption strategies when implementing OSAs on social media platforms.

Indexed as

AcceptanceConversational commerceE-commerceIntention to useOnline shopping assistantTAM

Identifiers

PMID38318071
PMCPMC10840014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.