Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38318024›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

A modified U-Net convolutional neural network for segmenting periprostatic adipose tissue based on contour feature learning.

Gang Wang, Jinyue Hu, Yu Zhang, Zhaolin Xiao, Mengxing Huang, Zhanping He, Jing Chen, Zhiming Bai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gang WangDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, Haikou, 570208, Hainan Province, China.
Jinyue HuDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, Haikou, 570208, Hainan Province, China.
Yu ZhangCollege of Computer Science and Cyberspace Security, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China.
Zhaolin XiaoCollege of Computer Science, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an, 710048, China.
Mengxing HuangCollege of Information and Communication Engineering, Hainan University, Haikou, 70208, China.
Zhanping HeDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, Haikou, 570208, Hainan Province, China.
Jing ChenDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, Haikou, 570208, Hainan Province, China.
Zhiming BaiDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, Haikou, 570208, Hainan Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study trains a U-shaped fully convolutional neural network (U-Net) model based on peripheral contour measures to achieve rapid, accurate, automated identification and segmentation of periprostatic adipose tissue (PPAT). Methods: Currently, no studies are using deep learning methods to discriminate and segment periprostatic adipose tissue. This paper proposes a novel and modified, U-shaped convolutional neural network contour control points on a small number of datasets of MRI T2W images of PPAT combined with its gradient images as a feature learning method to reduce feature ambiguity caused by the differences in PPAT contours of different patients. This paper adopts a supervised learning method on the labeled dataset, combining the probability and spatial distribution of control points, and proposes a weighted loss function to optimize the neural network's convergence speed and detection performance. Based on high-precision detection of control points, this paper uses a convex curve fitting to obtain the final PPAT contour. The imaging segmentation results were compared with those of a fully convolutional network (FCN), U-Net, and semantic segmentation convolutional network (SegNet) on three evaluation metrics: Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and intersection over union ratio (IoU). Results: Cropped images with a 270 × 270-pixel matrix had DSC, HD, and IoU values of 70.1%, 27 mm, and 56.1%, respectively; downscaled images with a 256 × 256-pixel matrix had 68.7%, 26.7 mm, and 54.1%. A U-Net network based on peripheral contour characteristics predicted the complete periprostatic adipose tissue contours on T2W images at different levels. FCN, U-Net, and SegNet could not completely predict them. Conclusion: This U-Net convolutional neural network based on peripheral contour features can identify and segment periprostatic adipose tissue quite well. Cropped images with a 270 × 270-pixel matrix are more appropriate for use with the U-Net convolutional neural network based on contour features; reducing the resolution of the original image will lower the accuracy of the U-Net convolutional neural network. FCN and SegNet are not appropriate for identifying PPAT on T2 sequence MR images. Our method can automatically segment PPAT rapidly and accurately, laying a foundation for PPAT image analysis.

Indexed as

Contour featureDeep learningPeriprostatic adipose tissueProstate cancerU-shaped fully convolutional neural network (U-Net)

Identifiers

PMID38318024
PMCPMC10839980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.