Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38317951›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Influencing mechanism of the intellectual capability of big data analytics on the operational performance of enterprises.

Yan Liu, Hong Qiao, Junbin Wang, Yunfei Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yan LiuCollege of Economics and Management, Huanghuai University, Zhumadian, China.
Hong QiaoCollege of Economics and Management, Huanghuai University, Zhumadian, China.
Junbin WangDepartment of Logistic Management, Business School, Changshu Institute of Technology, Changshu, China.
Yunfei JiangDepartment of Logistic Management, Business School, Changshu Institute of Technology, Changshu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of big data, data processing capability is key to gaining a competitive advantage for businesses. With appropriate technical and organizational resources in place, enterprises can extract considerable value from the vast amount of available data, thereby increasing their competitive advantage. Therefore, to utilize big data resources effectively, enterprises should focus on improving the intellectual abilities of big data analysts. Big data analytics intellectual capability (BDAIC) refers to the specialized skills and knowledge that employees of the enterprise possess, including technical, technical management, business, and relational knowledge, that would enable them to use analytics tools to accomplish organizational tasks and shape the core competitiveness of an enterprise. This study constructs a theoretical model that focuses on the mediating role of person-tool fit and examines the mechanisms by which BDAIC affects an enterprise's operational performance. The results show that BDAIC, which contains four basic categories of knowledge, positively influences an enterprise's operational efficiency. Additionally, person-tool matching mediates BDAIC's effect on an enterprise's operational performance. These findings explore the latest avenues of exploration in the research paradigm of big data analytics. Furthermore, this study has important implications for practitioners trying to use big data to improve business performance.

Indexed as

big data analytics intellectual capabilityoperational performancePerson-tool fitResource-based viewtechnical management knowledge

Identifiers

PMID38317951
PMCPMC10839991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.