ArticleHeliyon2024
Administrative monopoly regulation and environmental innovation: An analysis based on China's asymmetric market structure.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To better understand the role of the competitive environment for firm innovation, this study takes China's Fair Competition Review System as an example to explore the impact of administrative monopoly regulation on environmental innovation. By utilizing China's market Structure, the study devises a quasi-natural experiment. It employs the DID method to assess the causal relationship between administrative monopoly regulation and the firm's environmental innovation. The findings indicate that implementing the Fair Competition Review System induces a marked reduction in environmental innovation by firms in the administrative monopoly sector, suggesting a substantial inhibition effect of the policy. Further research shows that this inhibition effect primarily manifests in the short term. Breaking administrative monopoly and optimizing the market environment wield the potential to increase firm environmental innovation in the long term. Evidence from the mechanism analysis highlights the critical roles played by factors such as industry competition, industry environmental uncertainty, R&D investments, financial constraints, and government subsidies in driving this process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.