ArticleHeliyon2024
Public perceptions of government policies to COVID-19: A comparative study in six African countries.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The outbreak of COVID-19 has affected countries across the world, including those in Africa. Governments in these countries have implemented various policies to curb the spread of the virus. However, the effectiveness of these policies largely depends on how the public perceives them. This study aims to investigate public perceptions of government policies regarding COVID-19 in six African countries by conducting a sentiment analysis of the public. The motivation behind this study relies in the recognition that a deeper understanding of public perceptions is essential for crafting effective strategies that resonate with the diverse needs and concerns of the population, ultimately contributing to the ongoing global efforts to navigate the complexities of the COVID-19 pandemic. We collected tweets related to COVID-19 and government policies on Twitter's API from March 07, 2020 to February 02, 2022. We performed data processing steps such as tokenization and stop-word removal to clean the data. Next, we used Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to classify the sentiment of each tweet as positive, negative, or neutral. The six African countries selected for this study are Nigeria, South Africa, Kenya, Ghana, Rwanda, and Uganda. We collected 134,494 tweets on Twitter accounts and we evaluated policies by countries in three categories: while some countries implemented too strict policies, others implemented strict or relaxed policies. The findings of this study will provide valuable insights into how the public perceived the policies. This is used to advice policymakers and public health officials on enhancing their messaging and policies to combat the spread of COVID-19 effectively. Data showed heterogeneous reactions with negative perceptions, for instance, earlier, different governments implemented face mask and lockdown policies and vaccination policy later. Researchers and policymakers should exercise caution and consider complementary data sources and methods to ensure a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of public perceptions in the context of government policies related to COVID-19; also, investigate how government policies during the pandemic may have affected the environment, such as changes in pollution levels, waste management, and conservation efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.