Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38317870›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Performance of Linear Mixed Models in Estimating Structural Rates of Glaucoma Progression Using Varied Random Effect Distributions.

Swarup S Swaminathan, Samuel I Berchuck, J Sunil Rao, Felipe A Medeiros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Swarup S SwaminathanBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Samuel I BerchuckDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
J Sunil RaoDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Felipe A MedeirosBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.

Funding

The BCI (Brain Computer Interface) Glaucoma Study: Objective Home-Based Detection of Progressive Visual Function Loss in GlaucomaR01EY029885 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ASRANI, SANJAY, MEDEIROS, FELIPE · 2019 to 2022
$2.2M
Improving Individualized Assessments of Glaucoma Progression with Population-Based Electronic Health Record DataK23EY033831 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Swarup Sai Swaminathan · 2022 to 2026
$1.1M
Objective Quantification of Neural Damage for Screening, Diagnosis and Monitoring of Glaucoma with Fundus PhotographsR21EY031898 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MEDEIROS, FELIPE · 2020 to 2021
$437k
Development of a program to assess and treat distress in glaucoma patients using an automated EHR-derived AI algorithmK99EY033027 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BERCHUCK, SAMUEL ISAAC · 2021 to 2022
$230k
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY033831NEI NIH HHS K99 EY033027NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029885NEI NIH HHS R21 EY031898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare how linear mixed models (LMMs) using Gaussian, Student Design: Retrospective cohort study. Subjects: Patients in the Bascom Palmer Glaucoma Repository (BPGR). Methods: Eyes with ≥ 5 reliable peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) OCT tests over ≥ 2 years were identified from the BPGR. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness values from each reliable test (signal strength ≥ 7/10) and associated time points were collected. Data were modeled using OLS regression as well as LMMs using different random effect distributions. Predictive modeling involved constructing LMMs with (n - 1) tests to predict the RNFL thickness of subsequent tests. A total of 1200 simulated eyes of different baseline RNFL thickness values and progression rates were developed to evaluate the likelihood of declared progression and predicted rates. Main Outcome Measures: Model fit assessed by Watanabe-Akaike information criterion (WAIC) and mean absolute error (MAE) when predicting future RNFL thickness values; log-rank test and median time to progression with simulated eyes. Results: A total of 35 862 OCT scans from 5766 eyes of 3491 subjects were included. The mean follow-up period was 7.0 ± 2.3 years, with an average of 6.2 ± 1.4 tests per eye. The Student Conclusions: LMMs outperformed conventional approaches for estimating rates of OCT RNFL thickness loss in a glaucomatous population. The Student Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Bayesian hierarchical modelingGlaucomaLinear mixed modelsOCTRetinal nerve fiber layer

Identifiers

PMID38317870
PMCPMC10838913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.