Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38317869›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Prediction Models for Glaucoma in a Multicenter Electronic Health Records Consortium: The Sight Outcomes Research Collaborative.

Sophia Y Wang, Rohith Ravindranath, Joshua D Stein, SOURCE Consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sophia Y WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Rohith RavindranathDepartment of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Joshua D SteinDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
SOURCE Consortium

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Yang Hu · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Enhanced Identification of Ocular Phenotypes and Outcomes in Electronic Health Record DataR01EY032475 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI STEIN, JOSHUA D · 2022 to 2025
$2.7M
Health Disparities in Utilization, Quality, and Outcomes for Three Common Ocular Conditions (HealthDOC)R01EY034444 · NEI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI DUSTIN D. FRENCH, Joshua D Stein · 2023 to 2026
$1.8M
Personalized Predictions for Glaucoma Progression Using Artificial Intelligence for Electronic Health RecordsK23EY032635 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, SOPHIA YING · 2021 to 2025
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032475NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Advances in artificial intelligence have enabled the development of predictive models for glaucoma. However, most work is single-center and uncertainty exists regarding the generalizability of such models. The purpose of this study was to build and evaluate machine learning (ML) approaches to predict glaucoma progression requiring surgery using data from a large multicenter consortium of electronic health records (EHR). Design: Cohort study. Participants: Thirty-six thousand five hundred forty-eight patients with glaucoma, as identified by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes from 6 academic eye centers participating in the Sight OUtcomes Research Collaborative (SOURCE). Methods: We developed ML models to predict whether patients with glaucoma would progress to glaucoma surgery in the coming year (identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes) using the following modeling approaches: (1) penalized logistic regression (lasso, ridge, and elastic net); (2) tree-based models (random forest, gradient boosted machines, and XGBoost), and (3) deep learning models. Model input features included demographics, diagnosis codes, medications, and clinical information (intraocular pressure, visual acuity, refractive status, and central corneal thickness) available from structured EHR data. One site was reserved as an "external site" test set (N = 1550); of the patients from the remaining sites, 10% each were randomly selected to be in development and test sets, with the remaining 27 999 reserved for model training. Main Outcome Measures: Evaluation metrics included area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) on the test set and the external site. Results: Six thousand nineteen (16.5%) of 36 548 patients underwent glaucoma surgery. Overall, the AUROC ranged from 0.735 to 0.771 on the random test set and from 0.706 to 0.754 on the external test site, with the XGBoost and random forest model performing best, respectively. There was greatest performance decrease from the random test set to the external test site for the penalized regression models. Conclusions: Machine learning models developed using structured EHR data can reasonably predict whether glaucoma patients will need surgery, with reasonable generalizability to an external site. Additional research is needed to investigate the impact of protected class characteristics such as race or gender on model performance and fairness. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Deep learningGlaucomaMachine learningMulticenter study

Identifiers

PMID38317869
PMCPMC10838906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.