Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38317712›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Predicting the survival probability of functional neuroendocrine tumors treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: Serbian experience.

Vladimir Vukomanovic, Katarina Vuleta Nedic, Marija Zivkovic Radojevic, Aleksandar Dagovic, Neda Milosavljevic, Marina Markovic, Vladimir Ignjatovic, Ivana Simic Vukomanovic, Svetlana Djukic, Marijana Sreckovic and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Krenning score enhances integrated biomarker models for survival prediction in PRRT-treated GEP-NET: a retrospective cohort study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Vladimir Vukomanovic *Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Katarina Vuleta NedicDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Marija Zivkovic RadojevicDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Aleksandar DagovicDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Neda MilosavljevicDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Marina MarkovicDepartment for Medical Oncology, University Clinical Center Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Vladimir IgnjatovicDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Ivana Simic VukomanovicDepartment of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Svetlana DjukicDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Marijana SreckovicDepartment of Medical and Business-Technological, Academy of Professional Studies Sabac, Sabac, Serbia.
Milena BackovicDepartment for Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Marko VuletaDepartment for Cardiology, Clinical Hospital Center "Dr Dragisa Misovic Dedinje", Belgrade, Serbia.
Aleksandar DjukicDepartment of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Verica VukicevicEmergency Medical Institute, Belgrade, Serbia.
Vesna Ignjatovic *Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
University of Kragujevac · RSClinical Centre of Kragujevac · RSMilitary Medical Academy · RSUniversity Hospital Center Dr Dragiša Mišović · RSUniversity of Belgrade · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a treatment option for well-differentiated, somatostatin receptor positive, unresectable or/and metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Although high disease control rates seen with PRRT a significant number NET patients have a short progression-free interval, and currently, there is a deficiency of effective biomarkers to pre-identify these patients. This study is aimed at determining the prognostic significance of biomarkers on survival of patients with NETs in initial PRRT treatment. Methodology: We retrospectively analyzed 51 patients with NETs treated with PRRT at the Department for nuclear medicine, University Clinical Center Kragujevac, Serbia, with a five-year follow-up. Eligible patients with confirmed inoperable NETs, were retrospectively evaluated hematological, blood-based inflammatory markers, biochemical markers and clinical characteristics on disease progression. In accordance with the progression og the disease, the patients were divided into two groups: progression group (n=18) and a non-progression group (n=33). Clinical data were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 51 patients (Md=60, age 25-75 years) were treated with PRRT, of whom 29 (56.86%) demonstrated stable disease, 4 (7.84%) demonstrated a partial response, and 14 (27.46%) demonstrated progressive disease and death was recorded in 4 (7.84%) patients. The mean PFS was a 36.22 months (95% CI 30.14-42.29) and the mean OS was 44.68 months (95% CI 37.40-51.97). Univariate logistic regression analysis displayed that age (p<0.05), functional tumors (p<0.05), absolute neutrophil count (p<0.05), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio-NLR (p<0.05), C-reactive protein-CRP (p<0.05), CRP/Albumin (p<0.05), alanine aminotransferase-ALT (p<0.05), were risk factors for disease progression. Multivariate logistic regression analysis exhibited that functional tumors (p<0.001), age (p<0.05), CRP (p<0.05), and ALT (p<0.05), were independent risk factors for the disease progression in patients with NETs. Tumor functionality was the most powerful prognostic factor. The median PFS (11.86 ± 1.41 vs. 43.38 ± 3.16 months; p=0.001) and OS (21.81 ± 2.70 vs 53.86 ± 3.70, p=0.001) were significantly shorter in patients with functional than non-functional NETs respectively. Conclusion: The study's results suggest that tumor functionality, and certain biomarkers may serve as prognostic survival indicators for patients with NETs undergoing PRRT. The findings can potentially help to identify patients who are at higher risk of disease progression and tailor treatment strategies accordingly.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine TumorsOctreotideAdultAgedBiomarkersDisease ProgressionHumansMiddle AgedRadioisotopesReceptors, PeptideRetrospective StudiesSerbiaBiomarkersOctreotideRadioisotopesReceptors, Peptidefunctional tumorsNEToverall survivalprogression free survivalPRRT

Identifiers

PMID38317712
PMCPMC10840135
OpenAlexW4390585161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.