ArticleArthroplasty today2024
The Location of Biofilms on Chronic Prosthetic Joint Infections and the Ramifications for Clinical Practice.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Convergent methodologies in prosthetic joint infection research: integrating transdisciplinary approaches to understand and prevent biofilm-driven failure of orthopaedic prostheses.Journal of medical microbiology · 2026Review
- Repurposing Non-Infectious Therapeutic Agents to Aid in the Treatment of Chronic Biofilm Infections.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Detection to Disruption: A Comprehensive Review of Bacterial Biofilms and Therapeutic Advances.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Biofilms in clinical infection: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and the evolving therapeutic landscape.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Review
- Biofilm-associated genes inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- What is the most advantageous lavage solution to use for fungal prosthetic joint infections.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- Retrospective Analysis of Factors Influencing Clinical Outcomes of Revision Surgery for Periprosthetic Infection After Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Article
- Investigating the Translational Value of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Models to Determine the Risk and Severity of Staphylococcal Biofilms.ACS infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Investigating the translational value of Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) models to determine the risk and severity of Staphylococcal biofilms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Freezing Nitrogen-Ethanol Composite Effectively EradicatesIn vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Revision surgery is paramount to cure chronic prosthetic joint infections because these infections are associated with biofilms on prosthetics that conventional antibiotics cannot eradicate. However, there is a paucity of research on where in vivo biofilms are located on infected prosthetics. Consequently, the objective of this pilot study was to address this gap in knowledge by staining 5 chronically infected prosthetics, that were removed at the time of revision surgery, with methylene blue. Scanning electron microscopic images were then taken of the methylene blue-stained areas to visualize biofilms. The findings show that all chronically infected prosthetics had biofilms located on the bone-prosthetic interface, yet only 2 had biofilms also located on the prosthetic interface exposed to synovial fluid. Subsequently, this pilot study provides a pathophysiological understanding of why the current treatment paradigm for chronic periprosthetic joint infection requires a revision surgery and not debridement and an implant retention surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.