Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38317595›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2024

Simulations of multiple breeding strategy scenarios in common bean for assessing genomic selection accuracy and model updating.

Isabella Chiaravallotti, Jennifer Lin, Vivi Arief, Zulfi Jahufer, Juan M Osorno, Phil McClean, Diego Jarquin, Valerio Hoyos-Villegas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Integration of crop modeling and sensing into molecular breeding for nutritional quality and stress tolerance.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Isabella ChiaravallottiDepartment of Plant Science, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jennifer LinDepartment of Plant Science, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Vivi AriefSchool of Agriculture and Food Sustainability Faculty of Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Zulfi JahuferSchool of Agriculture and Food Sustainability Faculty of Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Juan M OsornoDepartment of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0905-3523
Phil McCleanDepartment of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.
Diego JarquinAgronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5098-2060
Valerio Hoyos-VillegasDepartment of Plant Science, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1080-9148

Funding

Fonds de recherche du Québec - Nature et technologies 322853Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2020-07002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction model across different traits, parent population sizes, and breeding strategies when estimating breeding values in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Genomic selection was implemented to make selections within a breeding cycle and compared across five different breeding strategies (single seed descent, mass selection, pedigree method, modified pedigree method, and bulk breeding) following 10 breeding cycles. The model was trained on a simulated population of recombinant inbreds genotyped for 1010 single nucleotide polymorphism markers including 38 known quantitative trait loci identified in the literature. These QTL included 11 for seed yield, eight for white mold disease incidence, and 19 for days to flowering. Simulation results revealed that realized accuracies fluctuate depending on the factors investigated: trait genetic architecture, breeding strategy, and the number of initial parents used to begin the first breeding cycle. Trait architecture and breeding strategy appeared to have a larger impact on accuracy than the initial number of parents. Generally, maximum accuracies (in terms of the correlation between true and estimated breeding value) were consistently achieved under a mass selection strategy, pedigree method, and single seed descent method depending on the simulation parameters being tested. This study also investigated model updating, which involves retraining the prediction model with a new set of genotypes and phenotypes that have a closer relation to the population being tested. While it has been repeatedly shown that model updating generally improves prediction accuracy, it benefited some breeding strategies more than others. For low heritability traits (e.g., yield), conventional phenotype-based selection methods showed consistent rates of genetic gain, but genetic gain under genomic selection reached a plateau after fewer cycles. This plateauing is likely a cause of faster fixation of alleles and a diminishing of genetic variance when selections are made based on estimated breeding value as opposed to phenotype.

Indexed as

PhaseolusGenomicsModels, GeneticPlant BreedingQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID38317595
PMCPMC12806982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.