ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2024
Early Prediction of Mortality for Septic Patients Visiting Emergency Room Based on Explainable Machine Learning: A Real-World Multicenter Study.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evaluating Artificial Intelligence for Sepsis Prediction in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.Journal of medical systems · 2026Pooled it
- Prediction models for mortality in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Explainable Retrospective Sepsis Classification Based on Elixhauser Comorbidity Groups Using Machine and Deep Learning on MIMIC-IV.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Early prediction of renal replacement therapy within 24 hours after septic shock recognition in the emergency department using machine learning: a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected multicenter registry.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Development of a machine learning-based sepsis prediction model for real-world clinical settings in South Korea: a single-center retrospective study.Journal of Korean biological nursing science · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an explainable XGBoost model for early mortality prediction in pediatric sepsis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Development of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A Novel Machine Learning Approach to Assist Early Diagnosis of Diffuse Panbronchiolitis.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- Observational
- Prediction of postoperative infections by strategic data imputation and explainable machine learning.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Routine Laboratory Tests Predict 72-h Fatality in Patients With D-Dimer Levels ≥ 2 μg/mL: A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Statistical and Machine Learning Models.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025Article
- Review
- Bug Wars: Artificial Intelligence Strikes Back in Sepsis Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Prognostic Value of the CALLY Index in Sepsis: A Composite Biomarker Reflecting Inflammation, Nutrition, and Immunity.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- AI-Driven Prediction of Glasgow Coma Scale Outcomes in Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The role of artificial intelligence in sepsis in the Emergency Department: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Review
- The Role of Monocyte Distribution Width (MDW) in the Prediction of Death in Adult Patients with Sepsis.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Sepsis Management: An Overview for Clinicians.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Early Mortality Prediction in Septic Patients Using Routine Post-Diagnosis Clinical Data: A Multicenter Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Multiple organ scoring systems for predicting in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in the intensive care unit.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWorldwide, sepsis is the leading cause of death in hospitals. If mortality rates in patients with sepsis can be predicted early, medical resources can be allocated efficiently. We constructed machine learning (ML) models to predict the mortality of patients with sepsis in a hospital emergency department.
methodsThis study prospectively collected nationwide data from an ongoing multicenter cohort of patients with sepsis identified in the emergency department. Patients were enrolled from 19 hospitals between September 2019 and December 2020. For acquired data from 3,657 survivors and 1,455 deaths, six ML models (logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest, extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost], light gradient boosting machine, and categorical boosting [CatBoost]) were constructed using fivefold cross-validation to predict mortality. Through these models, 44 clinical variables measured on the day of admission were compared with six sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) components (PaO
resultsOf the 5,112 participants, CatBoost exhibited the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.800 (95% CI, 0.756-0.840) using clinical variables. Using the SOFA components for the same patient, XGBoost exhibited the highest AUC of 0.678 (95% CI, 0.626-0.730). As interpreted by SHAP, albumin, lactate, blood urea nitrogen, and international normalization ratio were determined to significantly affect the results. Additionally, PF and PLTs in the SOFA component significantly influenced the prediction results.
conclusionNewly established ML-based models achieved good prediction of mortality in patients with sepsis. Using several clinical variables acquired at the baseline can provide more accurate results for early predictions than using SOFA components. Additionally, the impact of each variable was identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.