ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
Machine learning-based MRI radiomics for assessing the level of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot study.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and triage in oral cancer: a clinician‑centered narrative review.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- AI-based neoadjuvant immunotherapy response prediction across pan-cancer: a comprehensive review.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Machine learning-based clinical-radiomics model for predicting recurrence risk after radical surgery in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma: a preliminary 2-year follow-up study.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Computed tomography radiomics reveals prognostic value of immunophenotyping in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison of whole tumor- versus habitats-based approaches.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- A novel nomogram for predicting overall survival in patients with tongue squamous cell carcinoma using clinical features and MRI radiomics data: a pilot study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the value of machine learning (ML)-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics in assessing tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels in patients with oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC).
methodsThe study included 68 patients with pathologically diagnosed OTSCC (30 with high TILs and 38 with low TILs) who underwent pretreatment MRI. Based on the regions of interest encompassing the entire tumor, a total of 750 radiomics features were extracted from T2-weighted (T2WI) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (ceT1WI) imaging. To reduce dimensionality, reproducibility analysis by two radiologists and collinearity analysis were performed. The top six features were selected from each sequence alone, as well as their combination, using the minimum-redundancy maximum-relevance algorithm. Random forest, logistic regression, and support vector machine models were used to predict TIL levels in OTSCC, and 10-fold cross-validation was employed to assess the performance of the classifiers.
resultsBased on the features selected from each sequence alone, the ceT1WI models outperformed the T2WI models, with a maximum area under the curve (AUC) of 0.820 versus 0.754. When combining the two sequences, the optimal features consisted of one T2WI and five ceT1WI features, all of which exhibited significant differences between patients with low and high TILs (all P < 0.05). The logistic regression model constructed using these features demonstrated the best predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.846 and an accuracy of 80.9%.
conclusionsML-based T2WI and ceT1WI radiomics can serve as valuable tools for determining the level of TILs in patients with OTSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.