Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38317062›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024

A new approach to describe the taxonomic structure of microbiome and its application to assess the relationship between microbial niches.

Vincent Y Pappalardo, Leyla Azarang, Egija Zaura, Bernd W Brandt, Renée X de Menezes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vincent Y PappalardoDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. v.y.pappalardo@acta.nl.
Leyla AzarangBiostatistics Centre, Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Egija ZauraDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bernd W BrandtDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Renée X de MenezesBiostatistics Centre, Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData from microbiomes from multiple niches is often collected, but methods to analyse these often ignore associations between niches. One interesting case is that of the oral microbiome. Its composition is receiving increasing attention due to reports on its associations with general health. While the oral cavity includes different niches, multi-niche microbiome data analysis is conducted using a single niche at a time and, therefore, ignores other niches that could act as confounding variables. Understanding the interaction between niches would assist interpretation of the results, and help improve our understanding of multi-niche microbiomes.

methodsIn this study, we used a machine learning technique called latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) on two microbiome datasets consisting of several niches. LDA was used on both individual niches and all niches simultaneously. On individual niches, LDA was used to decompose each niche into bacterial sub-communities unveiling their taxonomic structure. These sub-communities were then used to assess the relationship between microbial niches using the global test. On all niches simultaneously, LDA allowed us to extract meaningful microbial patterns. Sets of co-occurring operational taxonomic units (OTUs) comprising those patterns were then used to predict the original location of each sample.

resultsOur approach showed that the per-niche sub-communities displayed a strong association between supragingival plaque and saliva, as well as between the anterior and posterior tongue. In addition, the LDA-derived microbial signatures were able to predict the original sample niche illustrating the meaningfulness of our sub-communities. For the multi-niche oral microbiome dataset we had an overall accuracy of 76%, and per-niche sensitivity of up to 83%. Finally, for a second multi-niche microbiome dataset from the entire body, microbial niches from the oral cavity displayed stronger associations to each other than with those from other parts of the body, such as niches within the vagina and the skin.

conclusionOur LDA-based approach produces sets of co-occurring taxa that can describe niche composition. LDA-derived microbial signatures can also be instrumental in summarizing microbiome data, for both descriptions as well as prediction.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaBacteriaFemaleHumansMouthSalivaSkinBacterial sub-communitiesLatent Dirichlet allocationOral microbiomeUnsupervised machine learning

Identifiers

PMID38317062
PMCPMC10840258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.