Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38316958›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Feature importance feedback with Deep Q process in ensemble-based metaheuristic feature selection algorithms.

Jhansi Lakshmi Potharlanka, Nirupama Bhat M

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jhansi Lakshmi PotharlankaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Vignan's Foundation for Science Technology and Research, Guntur, 522213, India. laxmi.jhansi@gmail.com.
Nirupama Bhat MDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Vignan's Foundation for Science Technology and Research, Guntur, 522213, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feature selection is an indispensable aspect of modern machine learning, especially for high-dimensional datasets where overfitting and computational inefficiencies are common concerns. Traditional methods often employ either filter, wrapper, or embedded approaches, which have limitations in terms of robustness, computational load, or capability to capture complex interactions among features. Despite the utility of metaheuristic algorithms like Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Firefly Algorithm (FA), and Whale Optimization (WOA) in feature selection, there still exists a gap in efficiently incorporating feature importance feedback into these processes. This paper presents a novel approach that integrates the strengths of PSO, FA, and WOA algorithms into an ensemble model and further enhances its performance by incorporating a Deep Q-Learning framework for relevance feedbacks. The Deep Q-Learning module intelligently updates feature importance based on model performance, thereby fine-tuning the selection process iteratively. Our ensemble model demonstrates substantial gains in effectiveness over traditional and individual metaheuristic approaches. Specifically, the proposed model achieved a 9.5% higher precision, an 8.5% higher accuracy, an 8.3% higher recall, a 4.9% higher AUC, and a 5.9% higher specificity across multiple software bug prediction datasets and samples. By resolving some of the key issues in existing feature selection methods and achieving superior performance metrics, this work paves the way for more robust and efficient machine learning models in various applications, from healthcare to natural language processing scenarios. This research provides an innovative framework for feature selection that promises not only superior performance but also offers a flexible architecture that can be adapted for a variety of machine learning challenges.

Identifiers

PMID38316958
PMCPMC10844500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.