ArticleScientific reports2024
Automated resolution of the spiral torsion spring inverse design problem.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many mechanical applications take advantage of spiral torsion springs due to their robustness, compactness, and simplicity. Brand-new manufacturing methods allow to create spiral springs with unconventional geometries and materials that suit a wider range of uses demanding either linearity or nonlinearity. Designing a spiral torsion spring with a nonlinear desired torque curve may be a great challenge, due to their many degrees-of-freedom (length, width, thickness, arbor, and barrel diameters, etc.) and the complexity of the geometrical and mechanical requirements to ensure their manufacturability, system compatibility, operation safety and reliability; and the solution is never unique. This manuscript proposes and validates an innovative methodology for the resolution of this inverse design problem based on the application of a nonlinear restrained global optimization algorithm. This algorithm is adjusted to converge, out of the infinity of designs that match the desired torque curve and hold all the functional and manufacturing constraints, to a design solution that minimizes strip mass. The methodology is built on a formulation for the calculation of the torque curve of a generalized spiral spring, with or without coiling and with any along-the-length cross-section, already published by the authors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.