Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38316827›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

eDNA based bycatch assessment in pelagic fish catches.

Paulina Urban, Magnus Wulff Jacobsen, Dorte Bekkevold, Anders Nielsen, Marie Storr-Paulsen, Reindert Nijland, Einar Eg Nielsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paulina UrbanSection for Marine Living Resources, National Institute of Aquatic Resources (DTU Aqua), Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Silkeborg, Denmark. paur@aqua.dtu.dk.
Magnus Wulff JacobsenSection for Marine Living Resources, National Institute of Aquatic Resources (DTU Aqua), Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Silkeborg, Denmark.
Dorte BekkevoldSection for Marine Living Resources, National Institute of Aquatic Resources (DTU Aqua), Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Silkeborg, Denmark.
Anders NielsenSection for Marine Living Resources, National Institute of Aquatic Resources (DTU Aqua), Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Lyngby, Denmark.
Marie Storr-PaulsenSection for Monitoring and Data, National Institute of Aquatic Resources (DTU Aqua), Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Lyngby, Denmark.
Reindert NijlandMarine Animal Ecology Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Einar Eg NielsenSection for Marine Living Resources, National Institute of Aquatic Resources (DTU Aqua), Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Silkeborg, Denmark. een@aqua.dtu.dk.

Funding

European Maritime and Fisheries Fund through the Ministry of Environment and Food of Denmark, Miljø- og Fødevareministeriet 33112-I-19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelagic fish like herring, sardines, and mackerel constitute an essential and nutritious human food source globally. Their sustainable harvest is promoted by the application of precise, accurate, and cost-effective methods for estimating bycatch. Here, we experimentally test the new concept of using eDNA for quantitative bycatch assessment on the illustrative example of the Baltic Sea sprat fisheries with herring bycatch. We investigate the full pipeline from sampling of production water on vessels and in processing factories to the estimation of species weight fractions. Using a series of controlled mixture experiments, we demonstrate that the eDNA signal from production water shows a strong, seasonally consistent linear relationship with herring weight fractions, however, the relationship is influenced by the molecular method used (qPCR or metabarcoding). In four large sprat landings analyzed, despite examples of remarkable consistency between eDNA and visual reporting, estimates of herring bycatch biomass varied between the methods applied, with the eDNA-based estimates having the highest precision for all landings analyzed. The eDNA-based bycatch assessment method has the potential to improve the quality and cost effectiveness of bycatch assessment in large pelagic fisheries catches and in the long run lead to more sustainable management of pelagic fish as a precious marine resource.

Indexed as

FisheriesFishesAnimalsBiomassHumansSeafoodWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID38316827
PMCPMC10844201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.