Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38316820›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Female tilapia, Oreochromis sp. mobilised energy differently for growth and reproduction according to living environment.

Ros Suhaida Razali, Sharifah Rahmah, Yu Ling Shirly-Lim, Mazlan Abd Ghaffar, Suhairi Mazelan, Mohamad Jalilah, Leong-Seng Lim, Yu Mei Chang, Li Qun Liang, Young-Mao Chen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ros Suhaida RazaliHigher Institution Centre of Excellence, Institute of Tropical Aquaculture and Fisheries, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia.
Sharifah RahmahHigher Institution Centre of Excellence, Institute of Tropical Aquaculture and Fisheries, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia.
Yu Ling Shirly-LimHigher Institution Centre of Excellence, Institute of Tropical Aquaculture and Fisheries, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia.
Mazlan Abd GhaffarHigher Institution Centre of Excellence, Institute of Tropical Aquaculture and Fisheries, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia.
Suhairi MazelanHigher Institution Centre of Excellence, Institute of Tropical Aquaculture and Fisheries, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia.
Mohamad JalilahHigher Institution Centre of Excellence, Institute of Tropical Aquaculture and Fisheries, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia.
Leong-Seng LimBorneo Marine Research Institute, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.
Yu Mei ChangHeilongjiang River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Harbin, China.
Li Qun LiangHeilongjiang River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Harbin, China.
Young-Mao ChenBachelor Degree Program in Marine Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan. ymc868@mail.ntou.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4116-4090
Hon Jung LiewHigher Institution Centre of Excellence, Institute of Tropical Aquaculture and Fisheries, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia. honjung@umt.edu.my.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7002-8338
Universiti Malaysia Terengganu · MYChinese Academy of Fishery Sciences · CNNational Taiwan Ocean University · TWUniversiti of Malaysia Sabah · MY

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia FRGS/1/2014/STWN03/UMT/01/1 (UMT Vote No. 59333)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the energy mobilisation preference and ionoregulation pattern of female tilapia, Oreochromis sp. living in different environments. Three different treatments of tilapia as physiology compromising model were compared; tilapia cultured in recirculating aquaculture system (RAS as Treatment I-RAS), tilapia cultured in open water cage (Treatment II-Cage) and tilapia transferred from cage and cultured in RAS (Treatment III-Compensation). Results revealed that tilapia from Treatment I and III mobilised lipid to support gonadogenesis, whilst Treatment II tilapia mobilised glycogen as primary energy for daily exercise activity and reserved protein for growth. The gills and kidney Na

Indexed as

CichlidsTilapiaAnimalsFemaleGillsGlycogenLipidsReproductionSodium-Potassium-Exchanging ATPaseGlycogenLipidsSodium-Potassium-Exchanging ATPase

Identifiers

PMID38316820
PMCPMC10844322
OpenAlexW4391538254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.