Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38316750›Full record

Trial reportTranslational psychiatry2024

Targeting the prefrontal-supplementary motor network in obsessive-compulsive disorder with intensified electrical stimulation in two dosages: a randomized, controlled trial.

Jaber Alizadehgoradel, Behnam Molaei, Khandan Barzegar Jalali, Asghar Pouresmali, Kiomars Sharifi, Amir-Homayun Hallajian, Vahid Nejati, Benedikt Glinski, Carmelo M Vicario, Michael A Nitsche and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05501132 (Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05501132 phase1completednot on this map

Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Symptoms, Quality of Life, Cognitive Deficits and Brain Physiology of Patients With Obsessive-compulsive Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe National Brain Mapping Laboratory (NBML)Ran2020 to 2022Enrolled42ConditionsObsessive-Compulsive SymptomArmstranscranial direct current stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Linking the Supplementary Motor Network and Executive Function in Developing Brain.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Effect of Intensified Transcranial Direct-current Stimulation Targeting Bilateral Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on Craving Reduction in Patients with Opioid (Heroin) Use Disorder.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Jaber AlizadehgoradelDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-4803-0607
Behnam MolaeiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, School of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran. b.molaei@arums.ac.ir.
Khandan Barzegar JalaliDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Asghar PouresmaliDepartment of Family Health, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
Kiomars SharifiSharif Brain Center, Department of Electrical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Amir-Homayun HallajianDepartment of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5848-7841
Vahid NejatiDepartment of Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Benedikt GlinskiDepartment of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6745-4125
Carmelo M VicarioDipartimento di Scienze Cognitive, Psicologiche, Pedagogiche e degli studi culturali, Università di Messina, Messina, Italy.
Michael A NitscheDepartment of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany.
Mohammad Ali SalehinejadSchool of Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences, Tehran, Iran. salehinejad@ifado.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1913-4677
TU Dortmund University · DEArdabil University of Medical Sciences · IRHacettepe University · TRShahid Beheshti University · IRSharif University of Technology · IRUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Tehran · IRUniversity of Zanjan · IR

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 316803389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is associated with a high disease burden, and treatment options are limited. We used intensified electrical stimulation in two dosages to target a main circuitry associated with the pathophysiology of OCD, left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (l-DLPFC), and pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) and assessed clinical outcomes, neuropsychological performance, and brain physiology. In a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, thirty-nine patients with OCD were randomly assigned to three groups of sham, 2-mA, or 1-mA transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the l-DLPFC (F3) and pre-SMA (FC2) with anodal and cathodal stimulation respectively. The treatment included 10 sessions of 20-minute stimulation delivered twice per day with 20-min between-session intervals. Outcome measures were reduction in OCD symptoms, anxiety, and depressive states, performance on a neuropsychological test battery (response inhibition, working memory, attention), oscillatory brain activities, and functional connectivity. All outcome measures except EEG were examined at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up times. The 2-mA protocol significantly reduced OCD symptoms, anxiety, and depression states and improved quality of life after the intervention up to 1-month follow-up compared to the sham group, while the 1-mA protocol reduced OCD symptoms only in the follow-up and depressive state immediately after and 1-month following the intervention. Both protocols partially improved response inhibition, and the 2-mA protocol reduced attention bias to OCD-related stimuli and improved reaction time in working memory performance. Both protocols increased alpha oscillatory power, and the 2-mA protocol decreased delta power as well. Both protocols increased connectivity in higher frequency bands at frontal-central areas compared to the sham. Modulation of the prefrontal-supplementary motor network with intensified tDCS ameliorates OCD clinical symptoms and results in beneficial cognitive effects. The 2-mA intensified stimulation resulted in larger symptom reduction and improved more converging outcome variables related to therapeutic efficacy. These results support applying the intensified prefrontal-SMA tDCS in larger trials.

Indexed as

Motor CortexObsessive-Compulsive DisorderTranscranial Direct Current StimulationDouble-Blind MethodHumansPrefrontal CortexQuality of LifeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38316750
PMCPMC10844238
OpenAlexW4391541179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.