GuidelineNeurocritical care2024
Guidelines for Seizure Prophylaxis in Adults Hospitalized with Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Clinical Practice Guideline for Health Care Professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society.
Guideline in Neurocritical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Guidelines for Seizure Prophylaxis in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society.Neurocritical care · 2026Guideline
- Guidelines for Seizure Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Supratentorial Neurosurgery: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society.Neurocritical care · 2026Guideline
- Comparative pharmacotherapeutic efficacy and dose-related safety profiles of intrathecal baclofen: a systematic review and meta-analysis in neurological spasticity.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Epidemiology of Seizures and Association With Mortality in Adult Patients Undergoing ECMO: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Prophylactic Antiepileptic Drugs in Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Network Meta-Analysis.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Seizure Rates in Mild and Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury With Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Signal for Prospective Investigation of Seizure Prophylaxis in Moderate TBI.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Gabapentin and cognitive impairment after traumatic brain injury: A multinational cohort of 49,925 patients.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Article
- Seizure prophylaxis versus epilepsy prevention after acquired brain injury: a cross-sectional clinicaltrials.gov registry analysis, 2000-2026.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Patterns and Clinical Predictors of Antiseizure Medication Use in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.Research square · 2026Article
- Levetiracetam for Seizure Prophylaxis after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Severity-Stratified Cohort Study of 51,000 Patients.Annals of neurology · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- Real-World Antiseizure Medication Prophylaxis and Outcomes in Hospitalized Adults with Acute Brain Injuries.Neurocritical care · 2026Observational
- Article
- Penetrating brain injury with a nail gun: technical considerations and the role of cerebral angiography. Illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025Article
- Pharmacologic and Nonpharmacologic Pain Management in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multidisciplinary Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Levetiracetam Dosing Optimization in Neurocritical Care Population: Neuro-ARC Study.Neurocritical care · 2025Observational
- Article
- Acute symptomatic seizure prevention with perampanel in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective comparison with levetiracetam.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Resuscitation and Initial Management After Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Questions for the On-Call Shift.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is practice heterogeneity in the use, type, and duration of prophylactic antiseizure medications (ASMs) in patients with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles assessing ASM prophylaxis in adults with moderate-severe TBI (acute radiographic findings and requiring hospitalization). The population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) questions were as follows: (1) Should ASM versus no ASM be used in patients with moderate-severe TBI and no history of clinical or electrographic seizures? (2) If an ASM is used, should levetiracetam (LEV) or phenytoin/fosphenytoin (PHT/fPHT) be preferentially used? (3) If an ASM is used, should a long versus short (> 7 vs. ≤ 7 days) duration of prophylaxis be used? The main outcomes were early seizure, late seizure, adverse events, mortality, and functional outcomes. We used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to generate recommendations.
resultsThe initial literature search yielded 1998 articles, of which 33 formed the basis of the recommendations: PICO 1: We did not detect any significant positive or negative effect of ASM compared to no ASM on the outcomes of early seizure, late seizure, adverse events, or mortality. PICO 2: We did not detect any significant positive or negative effect of PHT/fPHT compared to LEV for early seizures or mortality, though point estimates suggest fewer late seizures and fewer adverse events with LEV. PICO 3: There were no significant differences in early or late seizures with longer versus shorter ASM use, though cognitive outcomes and adverse events appear worse with protracted use.
conclusionsBased on GRADE criteria, we suggest that ASM or no ASM may be used in patients hospitalized with moderate-severe TBI (weak recommendation, low quality of evidence). If used, we suggest LEV over PHT/fPHT (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence) for a short duration (≤ 7 days, weak recommendation, low quality of evidence).
Indexed as
Identifiers
38316735What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.