ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024
Sd-net: a semi-supervised double-cooperative network for liver segmentation from computed tomography (CT) images.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable deep learning for early diagnosis of chronic kidney disease from CT images in Bangladeshi patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AI-Based 3D Liver Segmentation and Volumetric Analysis in Living Donor Data.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- FSS-ULivR: a clinically-inspired few-shot segmentation framework for liver imaging using unified representations and attention mechanisms.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation Based on Deep Consistent Collaborative Learning.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence techniques in liver cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe automatic segmentation of the liver is a crucial step in obtaining quantitative biomarkers for accurate clinical diagnosis and computer-aided decision support systems. This task is challenging due to the frequent presence of noise and sampling artifacts in computerized tomography (CT) images, as well as the complex background, variable shapes, and blurry boundaries of the liver. Standard segmentation of medical images based on full-supervised convolutional networks demands accurate dense annotations. Such a learning framework is built on laborious manual annotation with strict requirements for expertise, leading to insufficient high-quality labels.
methodsTo overcome such limitation and exploit massive weakly labeled data, we relaxed the rigid labeling requirement and developed a semi-supervised double-cooperative network (SD- Net). SD-Net is trained to segment the complete liver volume from preoperative abdominal CT images by using limited labeled datasets and large-scale unlabeled datasets. Specifically, to enrich the diversity of unsupervised information, we construct SD-Net consisting of two collaborative network models. Within the supervised training module, we introduce an adaptive mask refinement approach. First, each of the two network models predicts the labeled dataset, after which adaptive mask refinement of the difference predictions is implemented to obtain more accurate liver segmentation results. In the unsupervised training module, a dynamic pseudo-label generation strategy is proposed. First each of the two models predicts unlabeled data and the better prediction is considered as pseudo-labeling before training. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Based on the experimental findings, the proposed method achieves a dice score exceeding 94%, indicating its high level of accuracy and its suitability for everyday clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.