Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38316659›Full record

ReviewEuropean radiology experimental2024

Image annotation and curation in radiology: an overview for machine learning practitioners.

Fabio Galbusera, Andrea Cina

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European radiology experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Applications of artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. DermIDS: Dermatology imaging data structure for scalable and interoperable AI systems.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fabio GalbuseraSpine Center, Schulthess Clinic, Lengghalde 2, Zurich, 8008, Switzerland. fabio.galbusera@kws.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1826-9190
Andrea CinaSpine Center, Schulthess Clinic, Lengghalde 2, Zurich, 8008, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

"Garbage in, garbage out" summarises well the importance of high-quality data in machine learning and artificial intelligence. All data used to train and validate models should indeed be consistent, standardised, traceable, correctly annotated, and de-identified, considering local regulations. This narrative review presents a summary of the techniques that are used to ensure that all these requirements are fulfilled, with special emphasis on radiological imaging and freely available software solutions that can be directly employed by the interested researcher. Topics discussed include key imaging concepts, such as image resolution and pixel depth; file formats for medical image data storage; free software solutions for medical image processing; anonymisation and pseudonymisation to protect patient privacy, including compliance with regulations such as the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 "General Data Protection Regulation" (GDPR) and the 1996 United States Act of Congress "Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act" (HIPAA); methods to eliminate patient-identifying features within images, like facial structures; free and commercial tools for image annotation; and techniques for data harmonisation and normalisation.Relevance statement This review provides an overview of the methods and tools that can be used to ensure high-quality data for machine learning and artificial intelligence applications in radiology.Key points• High-quality datasets are essential for reliable artificial intelligence algorithms in medical imaging.• Software tools like ImageJ and 3D Slicer aid in processing medical images for AI research.• Anonymisation techniques protect patient privacy during dataset preparation.• Machine learning models can accelerate image annotation, enhancing efficiency and accuracy.• Data curation ensures dataset integrity, compliance, and quality for artificial intelligence development.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRadiologyAlgorithmsData CurationHumansMachine LearningUnited StatesArtificial intelligenceData curationImage processing (computer-assisted)Machine learningPrivacy

Identifiers

PMID38316659
PMCPMC10844188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.