Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38316624›Full record

ArticleThe journal of vascular access2025

Safety and efficacy of a new covered stent in hemodialysis vascular access outflow stenosis: A Brazilian multicenter retrospective study.

Leonardo de Oliveira Harduin, Thiago Almeida Barroso, Julia Bandeira Guerra, Márcio Gomes Filippo, Leonardo Cortizo de Almeida, Brunno Ribeiro Vieira, Renata Silveira Mello, Adriano Martins Galhardo, Guilherme de Castro-Santos, Carlos Eduardo Virgini-Magalhães and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of vascular access, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Leonardo de Oliveira HarduinLiv Care Centro Clínico, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9012-9649
Thiago Almeida BarrosoAfya Hospital Dia, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Julia Bandeira GuerraImage Department, Hospital Niterói Dor and Centro Clínico LIVCARE, Niterói (Rio de Janeiro), Brazil.
Márcio Gomes FilippoVascular Surgery Service, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho (HUCFF), Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5399-1376
Leonardo Cortizo de AlmeidaVascular Surgery Service, Hospital Ana Nery, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Brunno Ribeiro VieiraInstituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Renata Silveira MelloVascular Surgery Service, Hospital Niterói Dor, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Adriano Martins GalhardoAfya Centro de Acesso Vascular, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Guilherme de Castro-SantosSurgery Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4455-3673
Carlos Eduardo Virgini-MagalhãesVascular and Endovascular Surgery Department, Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jorge Paulo Strogoff-de-MatosDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVascular stenosis commonly leads to dysfunction in hemodialysis vascular access. Although percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is an established treatment, stent utilization has increased in the last decade as an alternative solution to extend the access function. This study evaluated the safety and initial results of a new impermeable covered stent for treating vascular access outflow stenosis.

methodsInvestigators retrospectively analyzed 114 hemodialysis patients treated with polytetrafluorethylene-covered stents from September 2018 to September 2022 across four centers. Lesions treated were de novo or restenotic and located in the venous graft anastomosis, outflow segment, cephalic arch, and basilic swing point. Patients were followed by in-person physical examination at 1, 3, and 6 months, and Duplex ultrasound was performed to evaluate the vascular access circuit and in-stent restenosis. The primary efficacy endpoint was target lesion primary patency at 1, 3, and 6 months. Secondary endpoints included access circuit primary patency and secondary patency at 1, 3, and 6 months. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from local or systemic serious adverse events through 30 days post-procedure.

resultsForty-four patients had thrombosed access at the initial presentation, and 41 patients presented with recurrent stenosis. The target lesion primary patency rates at 1, 3, and 6 months were 100%, 89.4%, and 74%, respectively. The access circuit primary patency rates were 100% at 1 month, 85% at 3 months, and 62.7% at 6 months. The secondary patency rates at 1, 3, and 6 months were 100%, 96.4%, and 94.6%, respectively. In the adjusted multivariate Cox regression analysis, only recurrent lesions and female gender were associated with reduced primary patency rates. No serious adverse event was observed through the first 30 days post-procedure.

conclusionIn this retrospective analysis, a new covered stent was shown to be safe and effective for treating peripheral outflow stenosis in vascular access.

Indexed as

Arteriovenous Shunt, SurgicalBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationEndovascular ProceduresGraft Occlusion, VascularRenal DialysisStentsAdultAgedBrazilConstriction, PathologicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignRecurrencecovered stentHemodialysisstenosisstent graftvascular access

Identifiers

PMID38316624
PMCPMC11894853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.