Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38316595›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Beating the empty pelvis syndrome: the PelvEx Collaborative core outcome set study protocol.

PelvEx Collaborative

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05683795 (Pathophysiology, Mitigation, and a Core Outcome Set for the Empty Pelvis Syndrome After Pelvic Exenteration), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05683795 unknown statusnot on this map

Pathophysiology, Mitigation, and a Core Outcome Set for the Empty Pelvis Syndrome After Pelvic Exenteration: a Delphi-study by the PelvEx Collaborative

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of SouthamptonRan2023 to 2023Enrolled150ConditionsEmpty Pelvis Syndrome, Pelvic Exenteration, Pelvic Neoplasm, Pelvic CancerArmsConsensus study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

PelvEx Collaborative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe empty pelvis syndrome is a significant source of morbidity following pelvic exenteration surgery. It remains poorly defined with research in this field being heterogeneous and of low quality. Furthermore, there has been minimal engagement with patient representatives following pelvic exenteration with respect to the empty pelvic syndrome. 'PelvEx-Beating the empty pelvis syndrome' aims to engage both patient representatives and healthcare professionals to achieve an international consensus on a core outcome set, pathophysiology and mitigation of the empty pelvis syndrome. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A modified-Delphi approach will be followed with a three-stage study design. First, statements will be longlisted using a recent systematic review, healthcare professional event, patient and public engagement, and Delphi piloting. Second, statements will be shortlisted using up to three rounds of online modified Delphi. Third, statements will be confirmed and instruments for measurable statements selected using a virtual patient-representative consensus meeting, and finally a face-to-face healthcare professional consensus meeting. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine ethics committee has approved this protocol, which is registered as a study with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative. Publication of this study will increase the potential for comparative research to further understanding and prevent the empty pelvis syndrome. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05683795.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareResearch DesignConsensusDelphi TechniqueHealth PersonnelHumansTreatment OutcomeColorectal surgeryGastrointestinal tumoursGynaecological oncologyPlastic & reconstructive surgerySurveys and QuestionnairesUrological tumours

Identifiers

PMID38316595
PMCPMC10860036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.