Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38316558›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2024

Genetic Coupling of Mate Recognition Systems in the Genomic Era.

Michael G Ritchie, Roger K Butlin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Coupling of Barriers to Gene Exchange: Causes and Consequences.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  2. How Important Is Sexual Isolation to Speciation?Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  3. Quantitative Analyses of Coupling in Hybrid Zones.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael G RitchieCentre for Biological Diversity, University of St. Andrews, College Gate, St. Andrews KY16 9AJ, United Kingdom mgr@st-andrews.ac.uk r.k.butlin@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7913-8675
Roger K ButlinEcology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biosciences, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom mgr@st-andrews.ac.uk r.k.butlin@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4736-0954

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of "genetic coupling" in mate recognition systems arose in the 1960s as a potential mechanism to maintain coordination between signals and receivers during evolutionary divergence. At its most basic it proposed that the same genes might influence trait and preference, and therefore mutations could result in coordinated changes in both traits. Since then, the concept has expanded in scope and is often used to include linkage or genetic correlation between recognition system components. Here we review evidence for genetic coupling, concentrating on proposed examples of a common genetic basis for signals and preferences. Mapping studies have identified several examples of tight genetic linkage between genomic regions influencing signals and preferences, or assortative mating. Whether this extends as far as demonstrating pleiotropy remains a more open question. Some studies, notably of

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenomicsAnimalsDrosophilaMutationPhenotypeReproduction

Identifiers

PMID38316558
PMCPMC10982690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.