Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38316533›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2024

Evaluation of a digital FFQ using 24 h recalls as reference method, for assessment of habitual diet in women with South Asian origin in Norway.

Monica H Carlsen, Torunn Holm Totland, Radhika Kumar, Therese Ml Lensnes, Archana Sharma, A Anita Suntharalingam, Anh Thi Tran, Kåre I Birkeland, Christine Sommer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Monica H CarlsenDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Postboks 1046 Blindern, Oslo0317, Norway.
Torunn Holm TotlandDepartment of Physical Health and Ageing, Division of Mental and Physical Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Radhika KumarDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Postboks 1046 Blindern, Oslo0317, Norway.
Therese Ml LensnesDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Postboks 1046 Blindern, Oslo0317, Norway.
Archana SharmaDepartment of Endocrinology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
A Anita SuntharalingamDepartment of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Anh Thi TranDepartment of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Kåre I BirkelandDepartment of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Christine SommerDepartment of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7370-8988

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDietary assessment tools should be designed for the target population. We developed an FFQ designed to assess diet in South Asian women in Norway. The study objective was to evaluate this FFQ using 24-h dietary recalls as reference method.

designApproximately 3 weeks after the participants (

settingThe DIASA 1 study, in Oslo, Norway.

participantsWomen of South Asian ethnic origin participating in the DIASA 1 study were invited to participate in the evaluation study.

resultsThe WebFFQasia significantly overestimated the absolute intake of energy, protein, fat and carbohydrates compared with the 24-h dietary recalls. Absolute intakes of sugar, starch and fibre did not differ significantly between the methods. For energy percentages (E%), there were no significant differences, except for monounsaturated fat. Correlations were strong for E% from sugar and saturated fat and moderate for E% from fibre, carbohydrate, total fat and protein. Fourteen food groups out of twenty three were not significantly different compared with the reference method, and sixteen groups showed strong to moderate correlations.

conclusionThe WebFFQasia may be used to assess E% from habitual diet and can adequately estimate intakes and rank participants according to nutrient intake and main food categories at group level.

Indexed as

DietEnergy IntakeDietary FatsDiet RecordsDiet SurveysFemaleHumansMental RecallNorwayReproducibility of ResultsSugarsSurveys and QuestionnairesDietary FatsSugarsDietFFQMethod evaluationSouth Asian immigrants

Identifiers

PMID38316533
PMCPMC10882527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.