Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38316289›Full record

ReviewJournal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders2024

Review of the literature supporting international clinical practice guidelines on iliac venous stenting and their applicability to Australia and New Zealand practice.

Laurencia Maria Villalba, Iman Bayat, Steven Dubenec, Philip Puckridge, Shannon Thomas, Ramon Varcoe, Thodur Vasudevan, Ramesh Tripathi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Iliac venous stenting provides long-term relief from chronic pelvic pain.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Laurencia Maria VillalbaVascular Surgery, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia; Vascular Surgery, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: laurenciavillalba@live.com.
Iman BayatVascular Surgery, The Northern Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Steven DubenecVascular Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Philip PuckridgeVascular Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Shannon ThomasVascular Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ramon VarcoeVascular Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Vascular Surgery, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Thodur VasudevanVascular Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Ramesh TripathiVascular Surgery, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Flinders Medical Centre · AUNorthern Hospital · AUPrince of Wales Hospital · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUThe Alfred Hospital · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Wollongong · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe overall goal of this report is to provide a high-level, practical approach to managing venous outflow obstruction (VOO).

methodsA group of vascular surgeons from Australia and New Zealand with specific interest, training, and experience in the management of VOO were surveyed to assess current local practices. The results were analyzed and areas of disagreement identified. After this, the group performed a literature review of consensus guidelines published by leading international organizations focused on the management of chronic venous disease, namely, the Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, European Society for Vascular Surgery, American Vein and Lymphatic Society, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe, and American Heart Association. These guidelines were compared against the consensus statements obtained through the surveys to determine how they relate to Australian and New Zealand practice. In addition, selected key studies, reviews, and meta-analyses on venous stenting were discussed and added to the document. A selection of statements with >75% agreement was voted on, and barriers to the guideline's applicability were identified. The final recommendations were further reviewed and endorsed by another group of venous experts.

resultsThe document addresses two key areas: patient selection and technical aspects of venous stenting. Regarding patient selection, patients with clinically relevant VOO, a Clinical-Etiologic-Anatomic-Physiologic score of ≥3 or a Venous Clinical Severity Score for pain of ≥2, or both, including venous claudication, with evidence of >50% stenosis should be considered for venous stenting (Level of Recommendation Ib). Patients with chronic pelvic pain, deep dyspareunia, postcoital pain affecting their quality of life, when other causes have been ruled out, should also be considered for venous stenting (Level of Recommendation Ic). Asymptomatic patients should not be offered venous stenting (Level of Recommendation IIIc). Patients undergoing thrombus removal for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, in whom a culprit stenotic lesion of >50% has been uncovered, should be considered for venous stenting (Level of Recommendation Ib).

conclusionsPatients with VOO have been underdiagnosed and undertreated for decades; however, in recent years, interest from physicians and industry has grown substantially. International guidelines aimed at developing standards of care to avoid undertreating and overtreating patients are applicable to Australia and New Zealand practice and will serve as an educational platform for future developments.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresIliac VeinStentsAustraliaConsensusHumansNew ZealandPatient SelectionPractice Guidelines as TopicTreatment OutcomeVenous InsufficiencyIliac veinMay-Thurner syndromePractice guidelinesVenous outflow obstructionVenous stenting

Identifiers

PMID38316289
PMCPMC11523375
OpenAlexW4391508620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.