Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38315963›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2024

Machine Learning Predicts Oxaliplatin Benefit in Early Colon Cancer.

Lujia Chen, Ying Wang, Chunhui Cai, Ying Ding, Rim S Kim, Corey Lipchik, Patrick G Gavin, Greg Yothers, Carmen J Allegra, Nicholas J Petrelli and 11 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Multi-Pathway Study for Oxaliplatin Resistance Reduction.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Lujia ChenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Ying WangNSABP/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-0564-8303
Chunhui CaiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-1742-4999
Ying DingNRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-1352-1000
Rim S KimNSABP/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA.
Corey LipchikNSABP/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA.
Patrick G GavinNSABP/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA.
Greg YothersNRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-7965-7333
Carmen J AllegraDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL.
Nicholas J PetrelliHelen F. Graham Cancer Center and Research Institute at Christiana Care, Newark, DE.ORCID 0000-0002-9830-0807
Jennifer Marie SugaKaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials, KP NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Vallejo, CA.
Judith O HopkinsNovant Health Forsyth Medical Cancer Institute/Southeast Clinical Oncology Research NCORP, Kernersville, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-9829-1242
Naoyuki G SaitoMelvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.ORCID 0000-0001-9331-9982
Terry EvansUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Srinivas JujjavarapuIllinois CancerCare, P.C./Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Peoria, IL.
Norman WolmarkNSABP/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-7156-1110
Peter C LucasNSABP/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-4880-7172
Soonmyung PaikNSABP/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-9688-6480
Min SunUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-9792-6798
Katherine L Pogue-GeileNSABP/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA.
Xinghua LuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-8599-2269

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Elaina Harper · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
NRG Oncology NCORP Research Base-BIQSFPUG1CA189867 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Deborah Watkins Bruner, Lisa A. Kachnic · 2014 to 2026
$140.5M
NRG Oncology Biospecimen BankU24CA196067 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Tanner J. Freeman, Nilsa Del Carmen Ramirez Milan · 2015 to 2026
$42.6M
Interpretable deep learning models for translational medicine RenewalR01LM012011 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Tanner J. Freeman, XINGHUA LU · 2015 to 2026
$3.6M
Developing deep learning models for precision oncologyR00LM013089 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CHEN, LUJIA · 2022 to 2024
$691k
Developing deep learning models for precision oncologyK99LM013089 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CHEN, LUJIA · 2020 to 2021
$185k
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196067NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189867NLM NIH HHS K99 LM013089NLM NIH HHS R00 LM013089NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA combination of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) is the standard for adjuvant therapy of resected early-stage colon cancer (CC). Oxaliplatin leads to lasting and disabling neurotoxicity. Reserving the regimen for patients who benefit from oxaliplatin would maximize efficacy and minimize unnecessary adverse side effects.

methodsWe trained a new machine learning model, referred to as the colon oxaliplatin signature (COLOXIS) model, for predicting response to oxaliplatin-containing regimens. We examined whether COLOXIS was predictive of oxaliplatin benefits in the CC adjuvant setting among 1,065 patients treated with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FULV; n = 421) or FULV + oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; n = 644) from NSABP C-07 and C-08 phase III trials. The COLOXIS model dichotomizes patients into COLOXIS+ (oxaliplatin responder) and COLOXIS- (nonresponder) groups. Eight-year recurrence-free survival was used to evaluate oxaliplatin benefits within each of the groups, and the predictive value of the COLOXIS model was assessed using the

resultsAmong 1,065 patients, 526 were predicted as COLOXIS+ and 539 as COLOXIS-. The COLOXIS+ prediction was associated with prognosis for FULV-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.52 [95% CI, 1.07 to 2.15];

conclusionThe COLOXIS model is predictive of oxaliplatin benefits in the CC adjuvant setting. The results provide evidence supporting a change in CC adjuvant therapy: reserve oxaliplatin only for COLOXIS+ patients, but further investigation is warranted.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsColonic NeoplasmsFluorouracilLeucovorinMachine LearningOxaliplatinAdultAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOrganoplatinum CompoundsFluorouracilLeucovorinOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatin

Identifiers

PMID38315963
PMCPMC11095904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.