Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38315867›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Mechanistic links between physiology and spectral reflectance enable previsual detection of oak wilt and drought stress.

Gerard Sapes, Lucy Schroeder, Allison Scott, Isaiah Clark, Jennifer Juzwik, Rebecca A Montgomery, J Antonio Guzmán Q, Jeannine Cavender-Bares

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gerard SapesDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.ORCID 0000-0002-6017-2053
Lucy SchroederDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.ORCID 0000-0001-8853-8611
Allison ScottDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.
Isaiah ClarkDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.
Jennifer JuzwikNorthern Research Station, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, St. Paul, MN 55108.ORCID 0000-0003-0577-7807
Rebecca A MontgomeryDepartment of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.ORCID 0000-0002-4131-1847
J Antonio Guzmán QDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.ORCID 0000-0002-0721-148X
Jeannine Cavender-BaresDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.ORCID 0000-0003-3375-9630

Funding

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 80NSSC21K1349National Science Foundation (NSF) DBI: 2021898National Science Foundation (NSF) DEB: 1831944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tree mortality due to global change-including range expansion of invasive pests and pathogens-is a paramount threat to forest ecosystems. Oak forests are among the most prevalent and valuable ecosystems both ecologically and economically in the United States. There is increasing interest in monitoring oak decline and death due to both drought and the oak wilt pathogen (

Indexed as

EcosystemQuercusDroughtsForestsTreesWaterWaterdroughtoak wiltprevisual detectionspectral reflectancetree mortality

Identifiers

PMID38315867
PMCPMC10873599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.