Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38315836›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

The elementary reactions for incorporation into crystals.

Rajshree Chakrabarti, Lakshmanji Verma, Viktor G Hadjiev, Jeremy C Palmer, Peter G Vekilov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Theoretical Perspectives for Biomolecular Crystallization Prediction.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Direct observation of cholesterol monohydrate crystallization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. A molecular view of peptoid-induced acceleration of calcite growth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rajshree Chakrabarti *William A. Brookshire Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-4004.
Lakshmanji Verma *William A. Brookshire Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-4004.ORCID 0000-0002-4345-1317
Viktor G HadjievTexas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004-50024.
Jeremy C PalmerWilliam A. Brookshire Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-4004.
Peter G VekilovWilliam A. Brookshire Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-4004.ORCID 0000-0002-3424-8720

Funding

NSF | Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences (MPS) DMR-2128121Welch Foundation (The Welch Foundation) E-1882Welch Foundation (The Welch Foundation) E-2170Welch Foundation (The Welch Foundation) V-E-0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growth rates of crystals are largely dictated by the chemical reaction between solute and kinks, in which a solute molecule severs its bonds with the solvent and establishes new bonds with the kink. Details on this sequence of bond breaking and rebuilding remain poorly understood. To elucidate the reaction at the kinks we employ four solvents with distinct functionalities as reporters on the microscopic structures and their dynamics along the pathway into a kink. We combine time-resolved in situ atomic force microscopy and x-ray and optical methods with molecular dynamics simulations. We demonstrate that in all four solvents the solute, etioporphyrin I, molecules reach the steps directly from the solution; this finding identifies the measured rate constant for step growth as the rate constant of the reaction between a solute molecule and a kink. We show that the binding of a solute molecule to a kink divides into two elementary reactions. First, the incoming solute molecule sheds a fraction of its solvent shell and attaches to molecules from the kink by bonds distinct from those in its fully incorporated state. In the second step, the solute breaks these initial bonds and relocates to the kink. The strength of the preliminary bonds with the kink determines the free energy barrier for incorporation into a kink. The presence of an intermediate state, whose stability is controlled by solvents and additives, may illuminate how minor solution components guide the construction of elaborate crystal architectures in nature and the search for solution compositions that suppress undesirable or accelerate favored crystallization in industry.

Indexed as

activation barriercrystal growthmolecular mechanismsorganic materialssolvent interactions

Identifiers

PMID38315836
PMCPMC10873555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.