Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38315544›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

Clinical Informatics Team Members' Perspectives on Health Information Technology Safety After Experiential Learning and Safety Process Development: Qualitative Descriptive Study.

Chantelle Recsky, Kathy L Rush, Maura MacPhee, Megan Stowe, Lorraine Blackburn, Allison Muniak, Leanne M Currie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chantelle RecskySchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5570-1563
Kathy L RushSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0879-7187
Maura MacPheeSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3603-8735
Megan StoweDigital Health, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1304-5060
Lorraine BlackburnVancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4749-6119
Allison MuniakHealth Quality BC, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5438-1584
Leanne M CurrieSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8232-2809

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough intended to support improvement, the rapid adoption and evolution of technologies in health care can also bring about unintended consequences related to safety. In this project, an embedded researcher with expertise in patient safety and clinical education worked with a clinical informatics team to examine safety and harm related to health information technologies (HITs) in primary and community care settings. The clinical informatics team participated in learning activities around relevant topics (eg, human factors, high reliability organizations, and sociotechnical systems) and cocreated a process to address safety events related to technology (ie, safety huddles and sociotechnical analysis of safety events).

objectiveThis study aimed to explore clinical informaticians' experiences of incorporating safety practices into their work.

methodsWe used a qualitative descriptive design and conducted web-based focus groups with clinical informaticians. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.

resultsA total of 10 informants participated. Barriers to addressing safety and harm in their context included limited prior knowledge of HIT safety, previous assumptions and perspectives, competing priorities and organizational barriers, difficulty with the reporting system and processes, and a limited number of reports for learning. Enablers to promoting safety and mitigating harm included participating in learning sessions, gaining experience analyzing reported events, participating in safety huddles, and role modeling and leadership from the embedded researcher. Individual outcomes included increased ownership and interest in HIT safety, the development of a sociotechnical systems perspective, thinking differently about safety, and increased consideration for user perspectives. Team outcomes included enhanced communication within the team, using safety events to inform future work and strategic planning, and an overall promotion of a culture of safety.

conclusionsAs HITs are integrated into care delivery, it is important for clinical informaticians to recognize the risks related to safety. Experiential learning activities, including reviewing safety event reports and participating in safety huddles, were identified as particularly impactful. An HIT safety learning initiative is a feasible approach for clinical informaticians to become more knowledgeable and engaged in HIT safety issues in their work.

Indexed as

community health servicesinformaticsknowledge translationpatient safetyqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID38315544
PMCPMC10877498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.