Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38315438›Full record

ReviewJournal of patient-reported outcomes2024

Identifying social outcomes of importance for childhood cancer survivors: an e-Delphi study.

Sarah H Milner, R G Feltbower, K L Absolom, A W Glaser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah H MilnerLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Woodhouse, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK. umshm@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2685-5296
R G FeltbowerLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Woodhouse, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
K L AbsolomLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
A W GlaserLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Woodhouse, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.

Funding

Candlelighters Trust RG.LIGH.126806Candlelighters Trust RG.ONCL.106374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChildhood cancer survivors (CCS) are at risk of deficits in their social outcomes, a key aspect of overall health and quality of life. Social outcomes of import are ill-defined leading to potential gaps in research and service provision. In this study, we undertook a preliminary consensus seeking exercise to support the development of a framework of the important social outcomes for CCS.

methodsA modified e-Delphi study was conducted with four groups: CCS, health professionals, social workers and teachers. Round 1, developed from a literature review, included 34 questions rated for importance on a 7-point Likert scale. Rounds 2 and 3 presented items not achieving consensus, additionally proposed items and in round 3, a ranking question.

resultsSurvey 1 was completed by 38 participants, 31 (82%) completed survey 2 and 28 (76%) completed survey 3. A total of 36 items were prioritised across 6 domains (education, independence, work, relationships, community, lifestyle), together forming the final list of social outcomes. Of these, 22 items met consensus for importance. Items rated most important were "having autonomy" and "avoiding social isolation". Quantitative and qualitative results reflected that social outcomes for survivors and general public should be the same.

conclusionWe have generated initial consensus on important social outcomes for CCS, highlighting the need for these to be matched to those of the general population. It suggests strategies are required to ensure autonomy and appropriate support for independence and relationships are provided through long-term aftercare and beyond. Further work is needed to validate and develop these findings into a framework to support appropriate social aftercare for CCS.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsChildDelphi TechniqueHumansQuality of LifeSurvivorsConsensusDelphi techniqueOutcomesSurvivors of childhood cancer

Identifiers

PMID38315438
PMCPMC10844160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.