ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024
Patterns of Access to Radiology Reports and Images Through a Patient Portal.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Digital patient journey after radiological diagnostics : Patient portals-what comes after the examination?]Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Use, Utility, and User Experience of Cloud-Based Medical Imaging in Pulmonary Nodule Care in China: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Access to radiology reports and images through a patient portal offers several advantages. The purpose of this study was to characterize patient's interactions with their radiology results. This was a retrospective study that evaluated radiography, ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography, exams performed between July 2020 and June 2021 for patients aged 12 and older. Exam information, access logs of radiology reports and images, and patient demographics were obtained from the electronic health record and image viewing software. Descriptive statistics were computed. The study included 1,685,239 exams. A total of 54.1% of reports were viewed. MRI and PET reports were viewed with the greatest frequency (70.2% and 67.6%, respectively); 25.5% of exam images were viewed, with the greatest frequency for MRI (40.1%). Exams were shared a total of 17,095 times and downloaded 8409 times; 64% of reports were viewed for patients aged 18-39 and 34% for patients aged 80 and greater. The rate of reports viewed was greater for patients with English as their preferred language (57.1%) compared to other languages (33.3%). Among those viewed, 56.5% of reports and 48.2% of images were viewed multiple times; 72.8% of images were viewed on smartphones, 25.8% on desktop computers, and 1.4% on tablets. Patients utilize a portal to view reports and view and share images. Continued efforts are warranted to promote the use of portals and create patient-friendly imaging results to help empower patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.