Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38315337›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2024

Microalgae as fishmeal alternatives in aquaculture: current status, existing problems, and possible solutions.

Shiyang Gao, Weijun Chen, Shenping Cao, Ping Sun, Xiaochan Gao

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
20.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Evaluation of Biorefinery Products FromAquaculture nutrition · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Physiological and Immunomodulatory Effects of Purslane Extract inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The MicroalgaeCells · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shiyang GaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471000, China.
Weijun ChenCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471000, China. wjchen@haust.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1008-6584
Shenping CaoHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Nutrition and Quality Control of Aquatic Animals, Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Changsha University, Changsha, 410022, China.
Ping SunCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471000, China.
Xiaochan GaoCollege of Agricultural Equipment Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.
Henan University of Science and Technology · CNChangsha University · CN

Funding

the Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Henan University of Science and Technology 13480087the Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Henan University of Science and Technology 13480088Young Scientists Fund 32202952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fishmeal is an indispensable ingredient for most aquatic animals. However, the finite supply and escalating price of fishmeal seriously limit its use in aquaculture. Thus the development of new, sustainable protein ingredients has been a research focus. Microalgae are potential fishmeal alternatives owing to their high protein content and balanced amino acid profile. Studies suggest that suitable replacement of fishmeal with microalgae is beneficial for fish growth performance, but excessive replacement would induce poor growth and feed utilization. Therefore, this paper aims to review research on the maximum substitutional level of fishmeal by microalgae and propose the main issues and possible solutions for fishmeal replacement by microalgae. The maximum replacement level is affected by microalgal species, fish feeding habits, quality of fishmeal and microalgal meals, and supplemental levels of fishmeal in the control group. Microalgae could generally replace 100%, 95%, 95%, 64.1%, 25.6%, and 18.6% fishmeal protein in diets of carp, shrimp, catfish, tilapia, marine fish, and salmon and trout, respectively. The main issues with fishmeal replacement using microalgae include low production and high production cost, poor digestibility, and anti-nutritional factors. Possible solutions to these problems are recommended in this paper. Overall, microalgae are promising fishmeal alternatives in aquaculture.

Indexed as

MicroalgaeTilapiaAnimal FeedAnimalsAquacultureDietAnti-nutritional factorsAquacultureAquafeedFishmeal substitutionHeterotrophic cultureMicroalgae

Identifiers

PMID38315337
OpenAlexW4391538338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.